Supreme Court upholds block on Trump's asylum ban

  • 📰 CNN
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 95%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

BREAKING: The Supreme Court upholds a federal judge's order blocking the Trump administration from implementing new asylum restrictions

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

About time law and order is upheld from these corrupt 9th circuit judges!! America has every right to HOLD an alien for however long we deem necessary if they are in our country illegally! Bravo Supreme Court!

How fitting that the Chief Justice becomes the new swing vote. Someone needs to speak truth to power.🦋

Amen

Good, he didn't think it was a good idea to ban asylum when he married two immigrants and brought his inlaws over here, he wants to close the door to Latino's but open it to Russians, who the hell, is he the gate keeper

Rule of law doesn't have a political party

go

And once again America loses!!!

He upheld the constitution!! That's what he 'sided' with. You should be part of the solution in dividing this country not be part of the problem. Cnnbrk

Trump will get us there one way or another.

Well won thing for sure Roberts is not a Trump puppet, he sided with the constitution.

Sad

You are the enemy 9f the people.. instead of reporting accurately you push agendas of the highest bidder...the biggest favor and you berate, terrorize and criminalize those who think, view and want differently from you. I hold you accountable for all actions illegals commit..

BuildThatWall

My

And, how did Cavanaugh vote? Well, we already know...has a mail order bride...

Having foolishly engaged with Trump about there not being Obama judges, how could Roberts turn around and say the judge was wrong and issue a stay?

There is a God! Thank you Lord...God Bless America

DanOgalo The way you identify the last two descending justices as “Trump” Justices is not correct. Decisions of Justices of the Supreme Court are based on interpretation of the law and not personalities

Why did I see this coming from Roberts. He's going to turn liberal activist judge.... What a disappointment.

If one were to genuinely seek asylum in the US, why would he / she not want to cross the border through the proper checkpoints but to sneak in illegally? Does that make sense? Think about it...

This is why man invented rope.

Chief Justice John Roberts is again on the wrong side of doing what is best for America. He has sided on open borders that have led to the destruction of crime and drugs pouring into the country. What a disgrace. msnbc cnn FoxNews nytimes oann maddow SenSchumer

elisewho 4 members of SCOTUS think laws no longer matter?

Just WOW! He also said forcing tax payers to BUY a product was 'Constitutional' so he's being blackmailed. NOT beyond the pale, considering how far the left went with the fake dossier!!!

Wtf is wrong with you? Why that headline? Thank goodness the mainstream media is dying

what's next from jihad john roberts..detonate a suicide vest in a room full of patriots?.. fly a commercial airplane into a huge patriot filled gathering?

Immigrants sneak across boarder - gets caught - “broken English - me claim asylum”

CNN anywhere is that FakeNews writer you had? Oh yea when it was leaked then he got fired for doing his Job TheCNNWay CNNFAKENEWS

How did Ruth vote? 👀 Like literally, how?

John Roberts is the gift that keeps on giving. Not to worry when RBG passes he’ll get 5-4 in his favor... .

realDonaldTrump that Supreme Court thing not working for you? Good, it's suppose to work for the Constitution of America.

This is an irresponsible headline- he sided with the LAW stop creating issues while we have a Mad King

Supreme Court isn't partisan (or shouldn't be) it's about rule of law

Well damn, good news 👍🏼

wonderful

What can you say bout that BoyKing

y You need to make a correction: That should read “...sides with US Constitution.” TruthHurts

Interesting noun choice, CNN. “Asylum ban?” Nope...No spin here.

With this tweet CNN again demonstrates why many think they are a biased media outlet. Roberts is about the only one on the court that does not try to legislate from the bench.

Don’t say “sides with liberals” it’s divisive language, stop placing people in tribes

The writer of these Twitter headlines needs fired

JeffRichgels ...sides with smart people.

So....I'm guessing it's safe to assume the MAGA Cult can no longer use the words 'See you in the Supreme Court'?

Hoist by his own petard! His own nominee voted against him.

He's definitely one of you CNN.

Is 'sides with liberals' really a responsible or necessary way to frame this?

realDonaldTrump Iraq War was Bush's biggest blunder. John Roberts was his second. John Roberts is not a Conservative justice. He looks like a liberal progressive.

We are in trouble! Not Trump US!! SHUT HIM DOWN QUIT ENABLING HIM!!HE IS IMPAIRED AND NOT FIT TO ACT AS PRESIDENT QUIT TALKING AND ACT not about the stupid wall anymore!

Resist___45 NotoriousRBG

SudanRevolts SudanUprising Sudan

John Roberts has decided I believe that Trump is a idiot. Good for him.

Can we stop saying “administration policy” and “executive order” and call it what it is? ProclamationOfAWannabeKing TrumpResign

Well it's a wrap.. Sorry donnie the best realDonaldTrump you lost Robert's and the supreme court now . 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

John Roberts is a snake in the grass!

Hold this L trumpers!

Terrible...

4forDictatorship

Labels ugh

Disgusting. Might as well open the borders. This country is doomed. Liberals are so happy right now. Just disgusting. There will never be any immigration reform. Just a pure joke. Sad to watch illegals come in and get everything handed to them while I struggle to make a livin

So one can sneak into the US illegally, a crime, and if caught still claim asylum. So this just encourages more illegal entry. If they make it in they live illegally and if caught they claim asylum. We citizens should be able to shoplift and then avoid any penalty if we pay.

I guess we have a rebirth of justice Kennedy

Why add “sides with liberals” - why not just write what’s true, “sides with what’s right”

This is why so many of us stopped watching. Not because we don't believe in you, because this is something Fox would say. How about: Sides with justice and the constitution of the United States of America? Just a thought. This, just no.

John Roberts sides with humans. Fixed it for you.

'Liberals'? Really, cnn?

Roberts is a pos.

We really are living in the Upside Down.

Aide to Central American countries needs to be used to create safe zones where asylum seekers can wait for their petitions to be processed. Mexico and the United States do not have the facilities to house large numbers of asylum seekers.

Supreme Court upholds block on President Trump's asylum ban in 5-4 ruling after Chief Justice John Roberts sides with the US Constitution. Fixed it for ya! 🙃

Roberts is a disgrace! Again - first Obama Nocare - Now against citizenship process. A RHINO from the beginning!

What 1st yr high school student at the bottom of the barrel writes the Trump Admin rules? Actually, HS students could do better. BTW..GREAT that the ban was defeated.'No Obama judges or Trump judges.'

Nabil Fekir

Justice John Roberts is an irresponsible anti-American liberal pile of shit. Americans are being robbed raped and murdered by some people that have come to this country illegally. Instead of honoring his Sworn Oath to protect the security of the American citizens, Roberts punted.

AllenHa19434025 turns out the new judge isn't as biased as they hoped huh

“If we don’t stand strong for our national borders, then we cease to be a nation and we betray our commitment to the loyal citizens of our great country.” - realDonaldTrump

lostint07245298 Thank You!!

Awful headline.

It is called Rule of Law..now this tweet to reflect this!

Thank God the judicial system is still working as it should

Wow

Republicans need to remember that it was Republican George W. Bush that nominated Roberts that sided with leftists on illegal immigration. They need to remember that Ronald Reagan nominated Kennedy and Sandra O'Connor. Both of them sided with abortion rights activists.

Take that, oh illegitimate president!

Sides with people with integrity, morals and compassion towards fellow human beings - fixed that for you

SirDoubleDee_

that moment when cnn claims the Supreme Court is partisan

But I was told we were going to get sick of his winning

Zebrafarm2000 I don't like to hear liberal or conservative judges. They should be impartial and interpret the law without bias.

Other Breaking News!: DJIA just closed at 22,485.41...last Fri it closed at 24,100.45...that's a DROP of 1,615 points in ONE WEEK!!! hows your 401k folks?

Roberts was a mistake. Never trust someone without biological children on making a decision that impacts the future.

BS

SuMoh7 Let’s not phrase this as ‘siding with liberals.’ Oh and FuckKavanaugh, that hack. BlueWave2020 saveSCOTUS

Thank you Justice Roberts we will need you again so to indict the sitting traitor

Well, I guess I have more south Americans and Mexicans invading my neighborhood. 🤦🏾‍♂️

Roberts is a bust!

Bravo!

Chief Justice Roberts does not like ImpeachKavanaugh on his court... He committed perjury, and everybody knows it!

Can someone please tell me how a border wall would have changed the outcome? Trump seems to think that a wall will solve all issues

Trump will soon be tweeting about that no good, 'so called judge'

At least that rotting corpse Ginsburg will be dead soon enough and none of this will matter

Roberts was comped long ago, he'll be impeached soon.

Change the law.

5-2-2* *Appointed by illegitimate puppet.

He sided with the.. ahem pesky constitution

Thank you, Chief Justice.

Open borders for Christmas

Lol at “sides with liberals.” How about just “upholds law and order?”

All 7000 should make a mad rush to the border attack every section now, let's see how that works out

Roberts is a closet Democrat. I don’t know why he just doesn’t come out of the closet.

A vote for decency and the law , seems Roberts is pissed with the orange imbecile..good

BOOM! Another smackdown of the Evil Empire!

Where’s the link to the opinion and dissent? Hard to tell if it’s the right or wrong decision without seeing the logic behind the decision.

TAKE THAT, TRUMP!!!!

Thank you, Chief Justice Robert’s for doing the right thing. ♥️

Like I've constantly reminded folks for years- John Roberts is a liberal pretender. Since AHCA passed- he's been compromised.

Lmao.... Trump is not having a good day.

Ah, I see the checks and balances are working as intended.

He’s siding with the law, dummies.

Countdown to baby tantrum has begun.

Time for Robert's to go now.

Good

That's the bad news. The good news is that Rip Van Ruthie is out in 2019, and another realDonaldTrump Appointee will stroll in. KAG2020🇺🇸 Still Winning

Trump has lost Roberts.

If there’s a 5-4 decision, then the law is clearly ambiguous and subject to interpretation.

Roberts is not just ‘aiding with liberals ‘ . He’s standing for the constitution, the rule of law and U.S. foreign policy set by congress and not the FalandererInChief TrumpShutdown

In this SC, Roberts is now the 'centrist' swing judge.

Doing the right thing and following the law is not 'liberal'.

Then they'll stay in tent cities until their hearings. The law is they have to immediately declare.

Winning

Shocking. We need a nuke in DC and start over

Must hurt all the RUSSIAN sympathizers to hear the US still obey by its laws and not frm a traitor-in-chief made up ones.

Be prepared for a tweet storm.

Thank GOD

TrumpResign

Ginsburg wasn’t in because of LUNG CANCER. Who was her delegate?

Because Trump is an IDIOT! The LAW IS THE ONLY THING THAT WILL STOP HIM! He thinks he is above GOD, LAW and EVERY MAN, WOMAN, and CHILD!

Take that BigotPresident

stop using the word liberal when describing the ruling. This clearly demonstrates that TRUMP is out of sync with the law + Constitution... it's not a liberal or conservative thing... it's an American thing.

Easy.. close the border. No asylum at all. Easy..

Let us pause for a moment and ponder this earthshaking development - The day John Roberts became a moderate and a swing vote.

Checked and Balanced!

Yeah no shocker

US has nothing to gain staying in Syria. It should keep helping with strikes, but troops should be coming home. Trump is right. Tatiana

How’s that winning working out for you MAGAts 😂

what is with this headline? 'sides with liberals'? whatever maybe he is siding with......doing the right thing.

Trump's twitter tirades haunting him this week. He doesn't understand human nature.

Of course he does

NOW US POPULATION IN DANGER -Supreme Court

“Siding with liberals” is an obnoxious headline - “upholding the law” may be better

e_espinosa Even they realize trump doesn’t know what he’s doing. That’s great

There’s no sides. Idiotic post.

Roberts disappoints again. How was RBG there to vote?

Yay! Trump pissed off Roberts! Not good for trump!

'sides with liberals' is a bad take

So now you love him.

That’s not “siding with liberals”. That’s just siding with law and order.

I understand some are concerned about US polling out troops from Afghanistan. US has been in Afghanistan for 17 years. Lost many troops there. Spent Billions of dollars. For what exactly? What is the point staying there doing the same? There is no point to keep going. Withdraw.

TrumpResign

Chief Justice Roberts is one of the bests.

TIRED OF WINNING YET?!

Thank fuck.

Winning!

Another loss for Trump. YAHOO!!! TrumpResign

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, released from hospital after lung cancer surgeryThe Supreme Court justice is recuperating at home before court is in session again Jan. 7. Don’t include the age for a living person Most people prefer to die at home even SATANIST The CIA Controlled Washington Post is the ENEMY of the PEOPLE Lung cancer.... . . . . . . . 90% of America knows what that means. . . . . .
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Trump could end up replacing 3, even 4, Supreme Court justices in his first termSo far, President Donald Trump is in line to only replace conservative judges, and likely to do so with other conservative picks. Ginsburg and Sotomayor are liberal judges, so replacing them with a conservative would be especially damaging to the Democrats hold on the court. Just don’t tempt fate, ok ? And all are undone when it’s proven that he was never legitimately elected.. poof
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

Opinion | How 2018's most important Supreme Court case defined America in the age of TrumpThe case severely damaged our nation's global standing and reminded Americans that the current court is not going to stop this president's agenda. President Trump is the best 🙏🇺🇸😇 Due process HERE ARE THE MOST EGREGIOUS FAKE NEWS STORIES OF 2018
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court Denies Trump Administration Request to Reinstate Asylum BanA divided Supreme Court rejected a request by the Trump administration to reinstate a ban on asylum claims by immigrants who cross the southern U.S. border illegally. The law says asylum is sought at port of entry. IT IS TIME WE GET RID OF THE SUPREME COURT! MAGA
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banThe Supreme Court won't let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border. Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues Friday in ruling against the administration in the very case in which... ONE MORE JUDGE TO APPOINT AND I WILL HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL! MAGA The supreme court says it's against the law to uphold the law. Yep, upside down. So much winning for these MAGAts it’s too much. 😂😂
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court turns down Trump request to restart asylum banThe Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow his asylum ban to go into effect during legal wrangling, but the court rejected the request. 🙄 Trump continues to lose everyday. IdiotInChief TrumpResign
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won't let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border. BREAKING NEWS; The Supreme Court on Friday refused to revive a Trump administration initiative barring migrants who enter the country illegally from seeking asylum. ANOTHER LOST FOR THE 🤡PRESIDENT don't give trump his way, he will abolish the job of supreme court. We know Roberts is compromised...that explains his Voting with the liberal judges just like the unconstitutional obamacare.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court denies Trump administration request to immediately enforce new asylum rulesTrump’s Nov. 9 proclamation barred asylum for anyone who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border between official ports of entry. Thank you Supreme Court. bUt ThEyRe JuSt PaRtIsAn HaCkS.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banThe Supreme Court won’t let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won't let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border. Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues Friday in ruling against the administration in the very case in which President Donald Trump had derided the 'Obama judge' who first blocked the asylum policy. New Justice Brett Kavanaugh and three other conservative justices sided with the administration. There were no opinions explaining either side's votes. winning What’s the point of laws anymore. Open border agenda in full effect LOL! Talk about a 'Trump shutdown.'
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »