So Bart Kavanaugh proves he is not fair and goes with politics instead of law.
Need the wall now more than ever.
Of course he did
Donald, you lost
The supreme court says it's against the law to uphold the law. Yep, upside down.
So much winning for these MAGAts it’s too much. 😂😂
ONE MORE JUDGE TO APPOINT AND I WILL HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL! MAGA
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Denies Trump Administration Request to Reinstate Asylum BanA divided Supreme Court rejected a request by the Trump administration to reinstate a ban on asylum claims by immigrants who cross the southern U.S. border illegally. The law says asylum is sought at port of entry. IT IS TIME WE GET RID OF THE SUPREME COURT! MAGA
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court turns down Trump request to restart asylum banThe Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow his asylum ban to go into effect during legal wrangling, but the court rejected the request. 🙄 Trump continues to lose everyday. IdiotInChief TrumpResign
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court denies Trump administration request to immediately enforce new asylum rulesTrump’s Nov. 9 proclamation barred asylum for anyone who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border between official ports of entry. Thank you Supreme Court. bUt ThEyRe JuSt PaRtIsAn HaCkS.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banThe Supreme Court won’t let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won't let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border. Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues Friday in ruling against the administration in the very case in which President Donald Trump had derided the 'Obama judge' who first blocked the asylum policy. New Justice Brett Kavanaugh and three other conservative justices sided with the administration. There were no opinions explaining either side's votes. winning What’s the point of laws anymore. Open border agenda in full effect LOL! Talk about a 'Trump shutdown.'
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
The Supreme Court Rejected The Trump Administration's Request To Let It Enforce Its New Asylum RestrictionIn a 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts joined his more liberal colleagues in denying the Justice Department's stay request. RBG phoning in her rejection from her hospital bed. She’s going to outlast them all! Yep. So we encourage lawbreakers. Remember one thing about Roberts. He was adamant about consensus opinions after becoming Chief Justice. That had red flags written all over it. That’s NOT his job! Interpret the Constitution and let chips fall where they may. SCOTUS is as political as every other branch!
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won't let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border. BREAKING NEWS; The Supreme Court on Friday refused to revive a Trump administration initiative barring migrants who enter the country illegally from seeking asylum. ANOTHER LOST FOR THE 🤡PRESIDENT don't give trump his way, he will abolish the job of supreme court. We know Roberts is compromised...that explains his Voting with the liberal judges just like the unconstitutional obamacare.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Trump could end up replacing 3, even 4, Supreme Court justices in his first termSo far, President Donald Trump is in line to only replace conservative judges, and likely to do so with other conservative picks. Ginsburg and Sotomayor are liberal judges, so replacing them with a conservative would be especially damaging to the Democrats hold on the court. Just don’t tempt fate, ok ? And all are undone when it’s proven that he was never legitimately elected.. poof
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »