Thanks to the Supreme Court, Your Taxes Now Fund Religious Indoctrination at Discriminatory Fundamentalist Christian Schools

  • 📰 MsMagazine
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Maine’s failure to fund these schools, the Supreme Court ruled, is discrimination that violates the parents’ religious freedom.

ruling. Taxpayers will be compelled to support schools that may oppose LGBTQ rights, are virulently anti-abortion, and assail any religion that is not their own narrow expression of Christianity. They actively discriminate, denying admission to students who fail to meet stringent religious qualifications, and they refuse to hire anyone who runs afoul of their faith, targeting LGBTQ+ people especially.

There is hope. The Supreme Court did not force Maine to create this voucher-like program; but it has said that if such programs exist, they must include religious schools. We can protect true religious freedom—and protect badly-needed funding for public education—by getting rid of private school vouchers and other taxpayer subsidies for religious education.

This case is a part of that hateful tradition and also the modern attack on public schools waged by a shadow network creating false controversies. The architect of the anti-CRT movement But vouchers aren’t a solution. Study after study shows that students using vouchers to attend private schools do no better academically than their public school peers. Many private schools incorporate elements into their curriculum that are incorrect or hateful and divisive. Oversight, if it exists at all, is lax.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 378. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Term in Review: Experts Warn of a Court Coming for Your RightsThis week, Michele Goodwin hosted six law and women's rights experts at the University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Law to discuss the Supreme Court's latest impactful rulings, including Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, West Virginia v. EPA, and more.'The writing has been on the wall for a long time,' said Erwin Chemerinsky at the July 6 event. 'This term was in one sense not a surprise, but it was shocking to see decision after decision come down in a conservative way.' michelebgoodwin ma_franks If a law is unjust, in its nature, in its agency, and in its purpose, it is false law.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »

Lawmakers Answer Supreme Court Threat to LGBTQ+ Equality With Respect for Marriage Act'It's past time for Congress to establish that marriage equality is the law of the land and ensure Americans across the country can continue to marry who they love without discrimination,' Rep. Mondaire Jones said of the Respect for Marriage Act. RepMondaire Again, fascists overstep boundaries of what they get to control! They do not get to decide this!
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Ted Cruz says legalizing gay marriage was ‘clearly wrong’ decision by Supreme Court'I think the decision was clearly wrong when it was decided. It was the court overreaching,' said Ted Cruz about the 2015 case that legalized gay marriage in the United States. Nobody is forcing him to marry a guy. He’s just jealous because 2 people of the same sex can love each other more than his wife loves him. SenTedCruz Cruz is one of the main supporters in suppressing women's free choice, LGBT equal rights, and the democratic Republic. VOTE OUT CRUZ! God says that marriage is made up of one man and one woman. Nothing else qualifies as marriage.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Sen. Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling Was IncorrectGay marriage could be next to go as a national right, assuming the Supreme Court falls in line with Ted Cruz's thinking here. Let’s all pretend like there wasn’t such a thing as civil unions before gay marriage was passed. Not true This is what happens when judges rule based on ideology. It emboldens the far right
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »

Former IU dean asks Supreme Court to investigate Todd Rokita after comments about doctorIndiana Attorney General Todd Rokita could face disciplinary action for statements he made on national television regarding the Indiana physician who provided abortion services to a 10-year-old Ohio girl. Someone should do the same for Yost he got the job because he's a rich fat man ninaturner Une bonne nouvelle pour cet état.
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »

Sen. Ted Cruz says Supreme Court 'clearly wrong' in decision legalizing same-sex marriageThe Texas Republican's remarks came just weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court “should reconsider” past rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges. tedcruz is about fifty years late with his opinion. Meanwhile women have been making biological choices; the Republican woke. RoeVWade Keep digging GOP, try to ban gay marriage. GOP’s extremism is finally repulsing the public. Trying to make a 10 year old rape victim carry rapists child, is bridge too far, even for the most heartless. And denying climate change is real, while we all bake, is waking folks up. Of course
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »