'It sickens me': Widow of Mountie killed in Moncton shooting angered by Supreme Court decision

determined that imposing consecutive periods of parole ineligibility in cases of multiple first-degree murders is "unconstitutional."

Nadine Larche, the widow of Douglas Larche, who was shot and killed by a gunman in June 2014 in Moncton’s north end, says she and her family are upset and hurt by the Supreme Court decision. On June 4, 2014, Justin Bourque killed Larche and two other RCMP officers -- constables Dave Ross and Fabrice Gevaudan -- during his rampage, which led to a 28-hour manhunt before he was captured. RCMP constables Eric Dubois and Darlene Goguen were injured in the shootings.

before being eligible for parole -- a sentence made possible due to a 2011 amendment to Canada’s Criminal Code allowing consecutive 25-year parole ineligibility periods to be imposed in cases of mass murderers, rather than imposing them concurrently., which effectively strikes down life-without-parole sentences for mass murderers, supports “the idea of rehabilitation,” and could potentially change his client’s sentence.

These stories are so stupid. What is she going to say.

25 years is a fuck of a long time

Thank Trudo as he is setting the bar with his new laws. Ban safe guns from privileged white folk and as he said in the house the other day there are too many blacks,non white in jail and so we need to have lighter sentences. What in the HELL is happening in Canada?

When politicians fail to defend our laws they join who? 9/11 and virus 2020 have any charges or conviction? Two crimes against humanity? Crime pay? Who profits?

the people of Canada are sickened as well ... TrudeauMustGo

what was the point of making sentences concurrent then? once again - CRIMINALS get preferential treatment and concern about THEIR rights while victims and their families get to be revictimized

This decision would make sense if these criminals were rehabilitated. They're not. Most never will be. Some people should be behind bars for the rest of their lives because they're just going to reoffend.

If not to be seen as devaluing the life of the victims, then what should we see it as?

This is wrong. Where is the accountability of the judiciary? We need civilian oversight judges

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Morning Update: Supreme Court rules against accused in 34 sex-assault cases in rowThe Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that, if the judge who presided over a trial believes a complainant, appeal courts should not disturb a conviction
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Families of Ontario murder victims outraged at Supreme Court rulingThe latest decision from the country's top court opened an old wound in Linda Babcock's heart. The Friday ruling that declared consecutive parole sentences unconstitutional brought back the sharp pain of her daughter's murder by a serial killer and his friend nearly 10 years ago - and left Babcock in tears. Don’t blame them but not surprised. Canada has become soft. Surprised not out on day parole yet. Everything in favour of the criminals. Crime is on the rise because the courts have gone soft. Commit a Violent crime and you’ll get a slap on the wrist
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court ruling devalues lives of most of mosque shooter’s victimsMurderers with multiple victims receive a gift from the top court, but Rosie DiManno thinks the justices have overlooked some of the purposes of incarceration. It’s most indubitably time to bring back the death penalty/capital punishment to Canada/Canadian Law! mizzionpozzible Overdo5e5tudiO5 PSSSSCK_Law2022 It’s most indubitably time to bring back the death penalty/capital punishment to Canada/Canadian Law! mizzionpozzible Overdo5e5tudiO5 The Supreme Court's ruling devalued the lives of all Canadians just a little bit more, another small step towards making a person's murder socially acceptable
Source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court backs victims in 34 sex-assault cases in rowGlobe analysis finds sexual-assault cases are on the rise during Me Too era, and defence lawyers have lost 34 consecutive appeals Yet, Fed Liberals just introduced Bill C-5, eliminating mandatory jail sentences for gun crimes? They were put in because Liberal judges were too lenient. How does that keep us safe? We already have the toughest gun laws in the world? Typical Liberal 'Hug-A-thug' soft on crime policies!
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »