‘Win for transparency’: ACT court rules in favour of Bernard Collaery’s challenge to secrecy order

Sensitive details surrounding Australia’s alleged bugging operation of East Timor will be heard in public after the ACT Court of Appeal ruled that requiring large parts of the case against Bernard Collaery to be heard behind closed doors created a real risk of damaging public confidence in the legal system.previous ruling made under national security laws

Lawyer Bernard Collaery is being prosecuted for allegedly helping his then client, Witness K, reveal aspects of an alleged secret bugging operation against East Timor.Mr Collaery has always accepted that some sensitive information should not be publicly disclosed but wanted the disclosure of six specific matters during the trial.

The ACT Supreme Court had ruled the public disclosure of certain information would have posed a real risk of undermining national security. “The Court emphasises that the open hearing of criminal trials was important because it deterred political prosecutions, allowed the public to scrutinise the actions of prosecutors, and permitted the public to properly assess the conduct of the accused person.”Human Rights Law Centre senior lawyer Kieran Pender said the judgment was a “win for transparency in Australia”.

ABCmediawatch Gallo_Ways Secret courts hide what a democracy needs to see Israel operates this way ..... putting people in jail for 25yrs then if they speak to wrong person they are thrown back in jail for 5yrs AUKUS are complicit with israels secret courts and nuclear weapons this is wrong

ABCmediawatch Gallo_Ways lot of cowboys falling off high horses these days ,very embarrassing ,and expensive too not to mention reputational damage

Gallo_Ways The Morrison Government and Transparency 🤣😂 Australia TheProjectTV

ABCmediawatch Gallo_Ways This a disgusting misuse of power in legal system. I understand issues have to remain secret but justice needs to be served fairly .

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Teacher launches Supreme Court challenge to Victorian government's COVID-19 vaccine mandateA casual relief teacher from Victoria claims the vaccine mandate that will require all authorised workers to be fully vaccinated over the coming weeks is not 'legally or ethically justified'. Article 3 Human rights charter You'll never win... The suit names Brett Sutton as a plaintiff? Am I misunderstanding something here? I will not denigrate anyone who makes the choice not to vaccinate it’s not my place to lecture or sway but should you choose NOT to then do not pursue employment in Public Service where you have contact with large groups of people or others who may have underlying health issues
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »