After the issue receive attention and her views became known, she told of feedback from the public who were dismayed that “lawyers of all people would use shaming, name-calling and hyperbole to shut off any and all discussion about a relevant topic to day-to-day practice in courts. They also mocked our B.C. courts as politically correct theatre.
Other lawyers called saying they, too, feared repercussions from the bench, law society and employers if they disagreed with the rules. “As if to add insult to injury, resolutions four and five were reactionary resolutions in opposition to resolution one, seeking again to silence politically incorrect views going forward. They are grossly appalling and undemocratic and worse of all, they were put forward by some benchers who took an oath where they promised to uphold the objects of the law society and to be guided at all times with the public interest in mind. These resolutions ought to shock your conscience.
He argued the directives allowed lawyers to impose, as a transgender practitioner put it, “their little pride parade every day in court” and use pronouns strategically to achieve their goals:Article content
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »