Supreme Court Revisits Boundaries of Creek Reservation

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court revisited the meaning of U.S. pledges to an American Indian tribe that was forcibly relocated to Oklahoma in the 19th century

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Monday revisited the meaning of U.S. pledges to an American Indian tribe that was forcibly relocated to Oklahoma in the 19th century.

The case asks whether the Muscogee reservation was dissolved when Oklahoma was admitted to the Union in 1907. A ruling could potentially put into question hundreds of criminal convictions from Oklahoma state courts. Native American defendants have been contesting those convictions, arguing that Oklahoma’s eastern half remains an Indian reservation and...

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

US must give all lands back to its legal owners.

Are there any left? 🏹

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Secrecy of Trump's taxes, financial records on the line in Supreme Court argumentsPresident Trump's lawyers will urge the Supreme Court on Tuesday to let him block access to his tax returns and other financial documents sought by 3 congressional committees and a New York prosecutor. This is as good as viewing any football game Soon as my audit is done
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Fact check: The Supreme Court did not deem social distancing unconstitutional in 1866A Facebook post offers what appears to be a fictitious excerpt from a real Supreme Court ruling to claim that COVID-19 emergency measures are illegal.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

President Trump to claim 'absolute immunity' from subpoenas in Supreme Court appealAttorneys for President Donald Trump this week will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to grant him sweeping immunity from investigation by Congress and local prosecutors into his conduct as a private citizen, as long as he's still in office. During oral arguments in three cases Tuesday, the justices will but when the president does it, that means it's not illegal. He should claim absolute stupidity
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

President Trump to claim 'absolute immunity' from subpoenas in Supreme Court appealAttorneys for President Donald Trump this week will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to grant him sweeping immunity from investigation by Congress and local prosecutors. He’s above Law clearly so are his friends they are untouchable....!!One day they will answer Off with his head. No one is above the law.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Who Flushed? A Supreme Court Investigation.A likely answer to the question swirling around the nation’s highest court this week. Same ones probly who brought building7 down 🤫 Oh I wonder could it possibly be a thing coloured ORANGE.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Will The Supreme Court Finally Force Trump’s Tax Returns To Be Released?Remember President Trump’s tax returns? It seems like a relic from the distant past, but only last December, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a trio of cas… Nope, this is America, not China The biased Roberts court? Doubtful. If they don't this country is completely lost
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »