Fact check: The Supreme Court did not deem social distancing unconstitutional in 1866

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

FACT CHECK: No, the Supreme Court did not deem social distancing unconstitutional in 1866

Claim: The 1866 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Ex parte Milligan deemed government-mandated emergency measures such as social distancing unconstitutionalAs states slowly reopen businesses to prevent further economic recession, individuals fatigued by social distancing measures and stay-at-home orders publicly have questioned the legality of such mandates.

The post then quotes what the user claims to be Section 98 of the court's opinion, which says any enforcement by officials to suspend “constitutionally guaranteed rights ” as “making war against our constitution.”More: Are you social distancing correctly? An AR guide to flattening the curve amid coronavirus

Story continues“Milligan contended that as he was not serving in the U.S. military, was not a prisoner of war, and was not living in a part of the U.S. that was in rebellion against the federal government, the U.S. military had no jurisdiction to arrest, try, and sentence him,” Snopes reported. The right to protect the publicThe government’s right to use police power to protect public health was upheld by the 1905 Supreme Court case Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, which as Snopes reported affirmed “the legal right of state legislatures to pass laws mandating use of smallpox vaccine by residents” and to enact reasonable regulations in the interest of public health.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Hears Case Of Teachers Claiming Discrimination From Catholic SchoolsThe California Catholic schools insist their religious liberty shields them from two ex-teachers' lawsuits alleging disability and age discrimination.
Source: HuffPostParents - 🏆 414. / 53 Read more »

President Trump to claim 'absolute immunity' from subpoenas in Supreme Court appealAttorneys for President Donald Trump this week will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to grant him sweeping immunity from investigation by Congress and local prosecutors into his conduct as a private citizen, as long as he's still in office. During oral arguments in three cases Tuesday, the justices will but when the president does it, that means it's not illegal. He should claim absolute stupidity
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

President Trump to claim 'absolute immunity' from subpoenas in Supreme Court appealAttorneys for President Donald Trump this week will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to grant him sweeping immunity from investigation by Congress and local prosecutors. He’s above Law clearly so are his friends they are untouchable....!!One day they will answer Off with his head. No one is above the law.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Who Flushed? A Supreme Court Investigation.A likely answer to the question swirling around the nation’s highest court this week. Same ones probly who brought building7 down 🤫 Oh I wonder could it possibly be a thing coloured ORANGE.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court examines discrimination lawsuits against religious schoolsThe Supreme Court on Monday will tackle a dispute concerning two teachers who sought to file employment discrimination claims against the religious schools that fired them. This is why it’s not really the Lamestream Media, it’s the Rigged Media....and it is what I’m up against. It was corrupt in 2016. Now it is much more corrupt, and what you are seeing is the least of it....but WE WILL WIN AGAIN! realDonaldTrump trump2020
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

As 2020 presidential contest looms, U.S. Supreme Court mulls power of 'electors'Bret Chiafalo had his bags packed in the weeks following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. If somehow his gambit worked and Donald Trump were blocked from officially being declared the winner, the information technology specialist from Washington state figured all hell might break loose. Police State ! Coming to America soon. Courtesy of Dems. The electoral college is the only thing they have right in broken Wash DC! Otherwise four states will elect the president every time!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »