Duchess of Sussex's court case against British newspaper begins

The first court hearing in a privacy case brought by Meghan, Britain's Duchess of Sussex, against a tabloid newspaper for printing part of a letter to her father has begun at London's High Court.

Lawyers for the duchess say its publication was a misuse of private information and breached her copyright. They are seeking aggravated damages from the paper.Given Britain's coronavirus lockdown, Friday's hearing was held by video, which the judge, Mark Warby, said was a relatively new way of conducting such cases.

The hearing is one of the first stages in the legal action and a date for a full trial has not yet been set., are expected to listen in remotely to part of the hearing, a source said.The lawyer for the newspaper, Antony White, sought to have parts of Meghan's claim struck out, arguing they were irrelevant or impermissible, not properly pleaded or disproportionate for the court to investigate.

Markle pulled out days beforehand after undergoing heart surgery and following news he had staged photos with a paparazzi photographer. Speculation about his attendance dominated the build-up to the ceremony.

it’s because harry is a ginger and no one likes a ginger hehe

Okay the Royals were never going to allow a Black person into the family. This is proven via the family tree that everyone can access. Just an observation not in any way agreeing with this

Guys I have started a channel to help out with income during these tough times. IK its not original content but I will start new content from next vid. This would men a lot to me and I would greatly appreciate it a lot

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Two Syrians stand trial in Germany accused of crimes against humanityIn the world's first criminal case against members of the Assad regime in Syria, two defendants stand trial in Germany, where they now live, for crimes against humanity. Dear SBS - why do you refer the “Assad regime” despite the presence of elections? Those (questionable) elections are in the same ballpark as Israel’s phony elections. When will you start referring to the “Netanyahu regime”? Or do prefer being a tool for western propaganda? What a joke..'the Assad regime' is a popularly elected, legitimate government. They have been defending their country for years, against Western-backed Islamic headchoppers - many of whom have found refuge in Europe. It's beyond hypocrisy. Guys, I have just started a youtube channel to see if I can get some source of income during these tough times. It would mean the world to me if you could just check it out here. I very much appreciate it and I will try my best to improve these videos
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »