by the porn company Bang Bros, which took over the domain and shared a video of its effort to destroy Porn WikiLeaks’ store of sensitive information. In a P.O.V. clip someone sprayed lighter fluid on a pile of hard drives, before flicking open a lighter and tossing it on top. The ensuing flames seemed an accurate representation of the degree of anger directed at the site—and the desire to see it finally disappear.
This isn’t to suggest that Wikipedia or IMDb are remotely comparable to PornWikiLeaks in scope: When checking against a list of roughly 50 performers, I found a couple dozen examples of purported legal names listed on Wikipedia and IMDb—a far cry from PornWikiLeaks’ several thousands. The same can be said of degree: PornWikiLeaks had directly linked to Love’s children’s Facebook profiles, enabling horrific, heart-breaking harassment.
However, in the majority of Wikipedia cases I found, performers’ listed legal names are not at all widely disseminated, a side effect, in part, of theof the site’s volunteer editing system. The editing system creates a frustrating lack of accountability, allowing parties to diffuse the blame when things do go wrong.
a couple years ago and went searching for performers’ legal names on IMDb and easily found 40 instances. She estimates that roughly eight times out of ten, when she went searching for a performer, she turned up their legal name. The union, she says, has strongly considered taking legal action against IMDb.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »