Ruling that threatened funding for Planned Parenthood will be reheard by appeals court

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal appeals court decided Wednesday that it will reconsider last month’s ruling that allowed the Trump administration to withhold family planning money from clinics that make referrals for abortion.

A federal appeals court ruled last month that the Trump administration could block funding for family planning clinics that make abortion referrals. On Wednesday the court said an 11-judge panel will rehear the case.

“Although we are heartened that the injunctions were reinstated, this is still the beginning of a long judicial process,” she said. The recipients may give women a list of providers that includes doctors who perform abortions but may not direct them to those physicians. That mandate would require providers to have separate offices and entrances for family planning and abortion services.

The panel that decided last month to permit Trump’s rule to take effect noted that the Title X family planning program at issue was limited by similar abortion-related restrictions in the past, and the U.S. Supreme Court upheld them.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Stupid move . As long as they are doing late term abortions no one should support them !

The 9th Circuit is very liberal. This things will be decided by SCOTUS.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

White House slams federal judge's detention ruling as 'at war with the rule of law'A federal judge halts a Trump Administration order that allowed for the indefinite detention of people who came to the U.S. to seek asylum, in a ruling that the White House said was 'at war with the rule of law.' Ironic since realDonaldTrump is literally 'at war with the rule of law' Child traffickers rejoice! D: The courts rule against Trump because the pathological liar who never learned anything about history, diplomacy or U.S. government keeps making wildly unconstitutional proposals R: The courts rule against Trump because judges are all mad Hillary lost
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Census to leave citizenship question off 2020 questionnaireBREAKING: The Census Bureau will *not* include a question about citizenship in the printed questionnaire for the 2020 census, according to an email sent by a DOJ official Illegals aren't citizens. They shouldn't be counted. Hell even registered aliens / green card holders aren't citizens - but they SHOULD be counted. Congress and journalists may still want to check the language before it comes out on how the questionnaire is worded
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »