WASHINGTON - In a major blow to election reformers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected efforts to rein in electoral map manipulation by politicians aimed at entrenching one party in power, a contentious practice known as partisan gerrymandering that critics have said warps democracy.
The court ruled for the first time that federal courts have no authority to curb partisan gerrymandering - a decision that could give lawmakers who control state legislatures even more incentive to draw maps after the 2020 census that disadvantage voters who tend to back the rival party. “The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government,” Kagan said. With her voice breaking, Kagan added, “With respect but deep sadness,” that the four liberal justices dissented.
The high court previously had struggled to resolve the legality of partisan gerrymandering, a longstanding practice in which boundaries of legislative districts are reworked with the aim of tightening one party’s grip on power. The justices in June 2018 failed to issue definitive rulings on partisan gerrymandering in two cases - this same one from Maryland and another involving a Republican-drawn electoral map in Wisconsin.
TV Holder and Obama got smacked down. This was their project.
TV EDITOR: Article TEXT does not mention census story, only gerrymandering. Video covers both. I'm annoyed I had to watch video rather than read the second topic as text. Enough of us don't care *either way* about video, but *do* read, esp. in common places video is untenable.
TV How about now, heh?
TV The gerrymandering decision will wash out ANY census results, valid or not. The gop activists on the court knew that. They threw us a bone (census decision) as cover for the real damage. Democracy is dead. Bury it. Get ready for max 'state's rights' Fiefdoms: TaliBama, Dixiesippi
TV Not a bit surprising!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court allows severe partisan gerrymandering to continueThe Supreme Court said Thursday that federal courts must stay out of disputes over when politicians go too far in drawing district lines for partisan gain -- a dramatic and sweeping ruling that could fundamentally affect the balance of power in state legislatures and Congress. Enjoy Gilead
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court allows partisan districts, blocks census querySupreme Court says Trump administration explanation for wanting to add citizenship question to census was “more of a distraction” than explanation. Forms are to be printed next week and it’s unclear whether the administration would have time to respond. Good....They got This one Right!! The Trump administration creating DISTRACTIONS? Now, who could imagine THAT? The census determines state funding, house representation and electoral college votes. I think that's enough of an explanation why we need a citizenship question.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court to issue major census, electoral map decisionsThe U.S. Supreme Court is due to issue eagerly awaited decisions on Thursday in ...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court to issue census, electoral map rulings on ThursdayThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to issue rulings on Thursday in major cases on the... Waiting with 'click-baited' breath... Ready for two big letdowns tomorrow. It is why it is very important to pack the bench after 2020, if assuming the worst doesn't happen. They stole 2 seats. Motherfucking cockdicks. GOP FedSoc. POTUS Cockdicks.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against allowing citizenship question on Census for nowThe Supreme Court ruled that there was 'a disconnect between the decision made and the explanation given' on adding a citizenship question to the...
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court rules cops can draw blood from unconscious drivers'There is clearly a 'compelling need' for a blood test of drunk driving suspects whose condition deprives officials of a reasonable opportunity to conduct a breath test,' the decision states. I don’t get it, I was collided by a car which caused me to be placed in a Coma. I was unconscious & cops pulled my blood, Zero alcohol in my system. If you got nothing to hide what’s the big deal? Hey .mattgaetz, no snoozing at the wheel Sounds like they would rule rape isn’t rape as long as she’s unconscious. I guess Bill Cosby will be getting out soon. SoStupid
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »