Justices rule courts cannot police partisan gerrymandering

  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules in 5-4 decision that courts cannot police partisan gerrymandering.

Choosing to keep the courts out of the politics of gerrymandering, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Thursday said there is no manageable standard for judging when partisanship goes too far in the drawing of electoral maps.

"No one can accuse this Court of having a crabbed view of the reach of its competence. But we have no commission to allocate political power and influence in the absence of a constitutional directive or legal standards to guide us in the exercise of such authority," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.

"We express no view on any of these pending proposals. We simply note that the avenue for reform established by the Framers, and used by Congress in the past, remains open," he said. The issue came before the court in the form of two cases -- one involving Republican redistricting in North Carolina and the other involving Democratic redistricting in Maryland. Lower court decisions in favor of challengers in both cases have been thrown out.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Very disappointing. So what is a partisan Supreme Court good for? So the states can run amuck...

So Trump's court doesn't believe in democracy. Big surprise.

And if the State Houses were to all go Blue, would the right be screaming how unfair the districts are?

the_tara_tweets Someone say my name?

Winning! Dems have lost control of the ghettos! The black man won today! Praise God!!

This is what happens when ideology overcomes expertise, and when folks with long black robes fail to understand the difference between overt intended racism and disparate and systemic racial outcomes that result from 'merely' partisan projects.

Gerrymandering is a local issue.....however, states should consider the National effect of it's action since each States defend on National Financial Support! Each States must do it's part for the country's common good and needs,to stay united!!!! That's how democracy work! RT

They made a fair ruling🎈🎈🎈

I really hate this new Math -- 5-4 decision. Show ur kids Wall Street movie. It will reinforce the Republican's Golden Rule theory: Fck everyone else, lets keep it all to ourselves! ☹️🤯alphaeta69 AP Lawrence MaddowBlog

Is there any other kind of gerrymandering?

Wow. The 'great experiment' is in tatters isn't it? Partisan gerrymandering is okay in the USA now.

So basically our “finest” legal minds don’t think elections should be fair. What good is a Supreme Court, the last resort for justice in many cases, that doesn’t uphold justice? What use do we have for a court that will amplify partisan politics? SCOTUS U SUCK!

So they just said crime is ok

Federal* courts, which is exactly how the SCOTUS was made to rule. The Supreme Court only interprets federal law... What did you expect...

By the scotus making that statement? They have shown us their thoughts,views,opinions,feelings and stance on the gerry mandering. They are becoming part of the problems with some of their rulings. What are the voters gonna do about this? We must vote the republicans out of senate

Great!! Now the DEMS can give the GOP a run for their money too, when they take the Majority!

Yes! Hot damn!

This is awesome! Winning elections pays off for a reason. Win an election or be quiet. Way to many illegals in this country.

USA r ruled by ppl through election, not by Court. I think more court gets involved, less power ppl have through voting. Dems shouldn't focus only very few cities. Dems should work harder to expand bases, not asking court help, so Dems can be lazy and not travel to rural areas.

Total cop out.

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Isn’t it odd that the supremes can not decide whether gerrymandering should go, it they can decide whether a women can decide for herself whether she should have a child?

This will probably end us. Country's downfall faster than predicted. Can't say I'm surprised.

It says federal court. What about state courtrooms? City courtrooms. Why can't a computer do it? I'm drawing straws here.

There's nothing wrong with this.😅😅😅

Congratulation, America! Racism is now the law of the land.

And there is the Merrick Garland screwjob come to evil GOP fruition.

The census question should have been allowed.

Bull shit

Bitch McConnell's Supreme Court as predicted has begun working for him and the trumpian party, by allowing state trumpians to destroy voting districts through gerrymandering which consequently destroys voting rights for millions of Americans.

The SCOTUS just encouraged the majority parties in EVERY state to institute an (almost) permanent majority regardless of changes in the electorate. They see no threat to our constitutional system?! This is NOT a partisan issue!

The Supreme Court! My fellow Americans, old white Republicans need to be voted out of every office in the nation. They are anathema!

This is what happens when an incompetent racketeer leads the country & infests our judicial system with power-hungry, parasitic sycophants

Scary how our democracy is being eviscerated by the Senate, the Trump administration backed by a partisan Supreme Court and all under the guise of hard line right

This seems like a step backwards in keeping elections fair and unbiased.

On the upside it’s good timing for a blue tsunami.

Gerrymandering and Golfing are my hobbies, thanks to VeteransHealth well payed. LAKings for life.

wsbtv Get REKT

American democracy at crossroads.

Here's the opinion, in all its infamy.

Well, now all elections are skewed and no one can stop it.

Should of brought a case from a blue state, i am sure they would had been shocked and offended

Absolutely disgusting. Again SCOTUS is proving to be an unchecked partisan form of government that doesn’t do its goddamn job. Gerrymandering weakens our democracy and left unabated, it is a revolting corrupt system leeching power away from voters.

Article 1, section 8: Section 8. Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the US

So let me guess who this is helping 🤷🏼‍♀️🤔🤔🤔🤔

🤣😂😅😆😁and the American oligarchy WINS AGAIN against the American peoples! How surprising, NOT! .. and the American people will once again just lay back, and accept being floor mats, for walking over, by those that CAPTURED their government

I feel like I was lied to in civics when I was told there was something called checks and balances.

Suddenly, the undermedicated, poorly educated screeching about Google stealing elections go quiet. Elections matter, case in point: Republicans & Democrats had record number turn out 2018 & Republicans were washed. They're outnumbered hopelessly, this is their last hope.

Republicans must be rejoicing. So much for every vote counts.

Complacency by voters, complicity by Congress and the phony “judicial” branch is leading to the downfall of America. Winter is coming. Putin is achieving his mission and all too easy.

What the fuck?

Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has been successfully corrupted by the Republican Party.

I would say to move on Electorial college and not come into play unless margin is less than 1% on popular vote.

Gerrymandering undermines democracy which undermines the constitution. If they don't interfere now there shall be no constitution to protect in the very near future.

Holy crap this is insane

Time to fight harder for our democracy and never take it for granted. See how easy it is to lose it all? A mad man and his judges.... it’s very easy and quick to decent into chaos, authoritarianism, dictatorships.....in just a short couple of years..

It’s time for states to stop recognizing SCOTUS and their decisions. It’s now a completely partisan joke aimed solely at protecting republicans and limiting the voice of anyone who isn’t a conservative white male. They only have power if states recognize them. Time to be done.

Shame on the SCOTUS. They have allowed partisanship in politics to disenfranchise American citizens' votes. Hang your heads. You are a disgrace to this country.

Bad call

Of course. Horrid.

Shame on them

Democrats accuse Republicans of gerrymandering and cheating while they themselves are flooding their states with caravans of illegals to pad their electoral votes.

Why am I not shocked? I haven't seen the ruling, but my bet is those in the majority opinon are: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch Takers?

MORE: Choosing to keep the courts out of the politics of gerrymandering, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority says there is no manageable standard for judging when partisanship goes too far in the drawing of electoral maps.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 471. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rejects limits to partisan gerrymanderingIn a major blow to election reformers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected efforts to rein in the contentious practice of manipulating electoral district boundaries to entrench one party in power by turning away challenges to political maps in Maryland and North Carolina. The justices, in a
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court decides federal judges cannot block gerrymanderingThe Supreme Court rules that federal courts may not block gerrymandering in a 5-4 decision that falls along partisan lines. This is wrong. The right for representation is a federal right. Of course a majority right winged court would rule that. I say burn down the court, its no longer the Supreme Court, they are just partisan republican hacks.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court allows gerrymandering in North Carolina, MarylandJUST IN: US Supreme Court rules in 5-4 vote that it cannot decide on the question of partisan gerrymandering, finding that 'partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.' - PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC If not them, who? Hello, God?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court Declines to Set Limits on Political GerrymanderingBreaking: Supreme Court declines to impose limits on partisan redistricting, a ruling that deals a major blow to critics of partisan gerrymandering California switched to a committee to set up the districts... and nothing changed. This whole Gerrymandering thing is people who cant face the fact that their ideology just isn't that popular among their neighbors. So we won’t have fair elections, 5 republicans decided this 'critics of partisan gerrymandering' - i.e. fans of democracy, i.e. putative Americans.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Brazil Supreme Court justices delay decision on Lula appealBrazil's Supreme Court on Tuesday delayed until August its decision on an a... Thanks God 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 FreeLula He will remain in jail forever! Thank God!🇧🇷
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »