WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court in the coming days will have a last chance before its three-month summer break to decide whether to take up President Donald Trump’s long-stalled bid to end a program that shields from deportation hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the country illegally as children.
The justices could have acted on the appeals as early as January but did not do so, with no reason given for the delay. The justices are in the last week of their current term, which began last October, with rulings due in eight remaining cases already argued. These include closely watched disputes over the Trump administration’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. census and whether limits can be set on partisan gerrymandering, a much-criticized practice in which state lawmakers manipulate electoral maps purely for partisan gain.
Three federal district court judges have issued orders halting Trump’s move to end DACA in lawsuits challenging the move filed by a group of states, people protected by the program, rights groups and others. Trump’s administration has argued that Obama exceeded his constitutional powers when he bypassed Congress and created the program.
Let's see how much realDonaldTrump will pay his judges to strike down President Obama's executive order and deport all DACA recipients.
Obama broke the law. He doesn't write laws.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.S. Supreme Court strikes down stiff firearms penaltiesConservative Justice Neil Gorsuch sided with the U.S. Supreme Court&39;s four liberal members on Monday in striking down as unconstitutionally vague a law imposing stiff criminal sentences for people convicted of certain crimes involving firearms. In the 5-4 ruling, with Gorsuch&39;s fellow conservatives Must of been the firearms bit. is gorsuch the new kennedy? Was a crime with a firearm violent if the weapon was not discharged? The distinction makes a difference with respect for the time to be served.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare cases with billions of dollars at stakeThe Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge from health insurers who argue the federal government owes them hefty Obamacare payments There they go again! Those private health insurers that everyone knows and loves. Enough is enough. We need MedicareForAll How is it possible that while something is STILL LAW, the president can just blatantly not follow it, yet there are virtually zero repercussions I speed 5mph and get a ticket I cant afford yet this piece of orange shit breaks the law repeatedly and it's fine. If anything the Insurance companies owe the people! A person spends more than $12k per annual weather they go to the dr or not... But they make you wait a year when they make a mistake on your file so to take your cash to line their own pockets! I say they need to be eliminated!
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court sides with designer over allegedly offensive trademarkNEW: Supreme Court sides with designer who sought to trademark allegedly offensive term but was blocked by a federal law prohibiting registration of 'immoral or scandalous' ideas. MORE: In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with a designer over an allegedly offensive trademark. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor dissented in part. Another beer please And that’s free speech, it’s a wrap.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court turns away challenge to Trump steel tariffsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge to President Donald Trump&39;s tariffs on imported steel brought by an industry group that argued that a key part of the law under which he imposed the duties violates the U.S. Constitution. The justices declined to hear the American Institute Democrats can no longer get their way by using the Courts.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court to review insurers’ Obamacare claims for $12 billionThe Supreme Court will decide whether insurance companies can collect $12 billion from the federal government to cover their losses in the early years of the health care law championed by President Obama. Poor health insurance companies. No one ever thinks of their feelings. Wow, socialism for corporations again! What losses?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court says law imposing extra prison time for ‘crime of violence’ is too vagueThe court ruled for two Dallas men who were convicted of robbing several convenience stores and then were given an extra 25 years in prison for carrying a sawed-off shotgun during the crime. Good SCOTUS (in the time of Trump) comes through again... even with the reactionary side of the Bench!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »