- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether the federal government must pay insurers $12 billion under an Obamacare program aimed at encouraging them to cover previously uninsured people after the healthcare law was enacted in 2010.
Insurers including Moda Health Plan Inc have said the government was supposed to help them recover from early losses they suffered after the passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare, under Democratic former President Barack Obama. Republicans, who have opposed Obamacare from the outset and sought numerous times to repeal it in Congress, have called the risk-corridor program a “bailout” for the insurance industry
Payments from insurers, though, could not fund all of the claimed risk corridor payments. In November 2017, HHS published statistics indicating that payments from insurers for the three-year period fell short of claimed payments by $12 billion.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare cases with billions of dollars at stakeThe Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge from health insurers who argue the federal government owes them hefty Obamacare payments There they go again! Those private health insurers that everyone knows and loves. Enough is enough. We need MedicareForAll How is it possible that while something is STILL LAW, the president can just blatantly not follow it, yet there are virtually zero repercussions I speed 5mph and get a ticket I cant afford yet this piece of orange shit breaks the law repeatedly and it's fine. If anything the Insurance companies owe the people! A person spends more than $12k per annual weather they go to the dr or not... But they make you wait a year when they make a mistake on your file so to take your cash to line their own pockets! I say they need to be eliminated!
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court to consider $12 billion lawsuit over Obamacare payments to health insurance companiesThe Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal from health insurance companies who say the federal government owes them $12 billion from losses sustained under the Affordable Care Act. Insurance companies have become welfare queens. But wait... Aww poor insurance companies...I feel so sorry for you in your time of loss. But don't worry, keep on working 80+ hours a week and maybe you too can work your way out of this medical debt... Hahaha is their any more reason to eat wealthy people
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court takes up insurers' $12 billion Obamacare disputeThe justices will hear an appeal by a group of insurers of a lower court ruling that Congress had suspended the government&39;s obligation to make the payments. The insurers have argued that the ruling would allow the government to pull a "bait-and-switch" and withhold money they were promised
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court Takes Case on ACA Risk-Sharing PaymentsThe Supreme Court agreed to consider whether the federal government is obligated to pay billions of dollars to health insurers who participated in Affordable Care Act exchanges that offered policies to consumers Good the federal government should not b in our business when it comes to your health Socialism, the gift that keeps on giving. How's that hopey changey thing working out for you? Like so many others, I had hoped for and supported change in our healthcare pricing system. ACA was a huge disappointment. Let's admit it was a bad plan and try something different instead of continuing to support it in order to justify our politics.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court bolsters rights for developers and property owners in California and elsewhereThe Supreme Court’s conservative majority gave a major boost to property rights, ruling that developers and landowners may go directly to federal court and seek compensation for a “taking” of their property. I can't wait to read the comments on this one.... Surprised you didn’t put the quotes around “their” VP Really, how? Try asking them, use my name if you want. I'm going to 'Somehow' prove in court that a NYS cop stole all of my $$s, papers and property...without 1st a method of my having rights to $$s, papers or properties and 'The State', not having them?(King Ramses died)
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »