Supreme Court bolsters rights for developers and property owners in California and elsewhere

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 62 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority gave a major boost to property rights, ruling that developers and landowners may go directly to federal court and seek compensation for a “taking” of their property.

The high court said property rights stand on the same footing as other rights protected by the Constitution.

The decision is likely to have its greatest impact in California, even though it began with a Pennsylvania woman’s complaint that people were walking across her property to visit a burial site.for development in its cities and along the coast, and property owners have repeatedly claimed these regulations and other zoning rules have the effect of “taking” their property.

“For years, federal ‘takings’ plaintiffs have effectively and inexplicably been denied access to the federal courts,” Beard said. “As of today, the federal courthouse doors are open. We should see a steady stream of new claims against laws and regulations that deprive or significantly impair an individual’s or business’ property interests.”

“This decision is a very long time coming for Rose and other property owners who have had federal courtroom doors slammed shut in their faces whenever they seek compensation for a governmental taking of their private property,” said attorney Dave Breemer. “The court’s decision sends a message that constitutionally based property rights deserve federal protection just like other rights.”cast the deciding vote. The case was first argued on Oct. 3, when Kavanaugh’s nomination was before the Senate.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

This is fantastic news!

fbi Really....all that will happen is I'll blow a lot of money and, after I collect, the police will say, Oops' and use my ass to move their money. The Constitution says 'reserved war powers' for a very good reason. Cuz I don't have them!

The Egyptians/Romans did the same shit for centuries...they give you a phony system of law and maintain their occupation. King Henry photocopied it. (Eminant domin under dead people.) The Founding Fathers solution was' Well, your alive and know better. Right?'

Huge

VP Really, how? Try asking them, use my name if you want. I'm going to 'Somehow' prove in court that a NYS cop stole all of my $$s, papers and property...without 1st a method of my having rights to $$s, papers or properties and 'The State', not having them?(King Ramses died)

Surprised you didn’t put the quotes around “their”

I can't wait to read the comments on this one....

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Lame-Duck Session That Limited Governor’s RuleThe Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a lame-duck session that limited the powers of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul. During the unscheduled session in December, GOP lawmakers took aim at various powers that the governor and attorney general can have in office.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

'Wolf Pack' found guilty of rape by Spain's Supreme CourtSpain's Supreme Court sentences five men known as 'The Wolf Pack' to 15 years in prison for rape. The case shocked the nation and brought heated protests over their original, lighter conviction. They should have been sentenced more than fifteen years
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with Mississippi death row inmate in jury discrimination caseThe Supreme Court held on Friday that a black Mississippi death row inmate should get a new trial, saying that the prosecutor who tried him six times for murder engaged in unconstitutional racial discrimination when striking African-American jurors from the panel.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

A prosecutor excluded black jurors from a murder trialA prosecutor consistently excluded black prospective jurors in the trial of a black Mississippian
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »