. The scandals had given the Trump campaign ambitions to flip the state in 2020—but the Supreme Court decision once again puts Republicans on the defensive.“With this particular district, it’s like a circle around my community. With the previous district, it was like over the river through the woods. It definitely cut out Democratic voters. The people who live down the street from me were not able to vote for me.
Virginia Democrats will now face a much more favorable map this November and hope to build on the legislative gains they made in the Commonwealth in 2017 and 2018. “We’ve seen that Virginia is a big indicator of national trends. We’re the only southern state that voted forin 2016. Then in 2017, it was really the start of the blue wave, right? Our 15-seat pickup was the biggest pickup in over a hundred years in Virginia.
In a sense, then, Bynum-Coleman has already won. Until now, she told me, Cox “hasn’t had to run a race, he hasn’t had to be accountable to anyone because the district was drawn for him.” After Monday’s Supreme Court ruling, she hopes, power will be back in the hands of the people—so long as she can get them out of their homes and to the polls. “To me the biggest challenge is going to be just making sure that we’re able to get people out to vote.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Lame-Duck Session That Limited Governor’s RuleThe Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a lame-duck session that limited the powers of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul. During the unscheduled session in December, GOP lawmakers took aim at various powers that the governor and attorney general can have in office.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court bolsters rights for developers and property owners in California and elsewhereThe Supreme Court’s conservative majority gave a major boost to property rights, ruling that developers and landowners may go directly to federal court and seek compensation for a “taking” of their property. I can't wait to read the comments on this one.... Surprised you didn’t put the quotes around “their” VP Really, how? Try asking them, use my name if you want. I'm going to 'Somehow' prove in court that a NYS cop stole all of my $$s, papers and property...without 1st a method of my having rights to $$s, papers or properties and 'The State', not having them?(King Ramses died)
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court set to decide major census, electoral maps casesThe U.S. Supreme Court, approaching the end of its current term, is due to issue... Grow a Spine & stand up for the Constitution, Supreme Court!!! I do not know how others might feel about our courts. I believe that the Supreme Court and others are just political tools for white nationalists and other groups who wish to oppress women and people of color.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Bolsonaro’s Conservative Agenda Is Tested in Brazilian Supreme CourtWhen Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro took office in January, he promised to defend what he calls traditional-family values, loosen gun laws and push the nation to the right after decades of mostly leftist rule. But six months into Mr. Bolsonaro’s administration, the Supreme Court is proving to be a powerful obstacle to his conservative agenda. Going to the right is the only solution to the countries significant problems, most rational people from Brazil would agree. Socialism is not yet viable in such a country... too much violence, illegal activity and corruption at all levels of society. You need pure capitalism... build a country up before you slowly improve the social safety nets and benefits to a sustainable and responsible level. Six month of nothing!
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Census, redistricting top remaining Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court enters its final week of decisions with two politically charged issues unresolved, whether to rein in political line-drawing for partisan gain and allow a citizenship question on the 2020 census. So citizenship census questions is on and stopping gerrymandering is off. Got it. Seems reasonable to question how many citizens live in an area if one wants to base representation off of it. Can’t wait for the Supremes to rule 5–4 that the citizenship question on the census is OK. In addition to that being the right call, the leftist meltdown on Twitter will be…
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »