in the three states where legal challenges were filed: Oregon, Washington, and California. Judges in the first two issued nationwide preliminary injunctions. But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel — made up of Judges Edward Leavy, Consuelo Callahan, and Carlos Bea, who were all appointed by Republican presidents — ruled Thursday that the domestic gag rule is a “reasonable” interpretation of the law.
"This decision paves the way for a full-blown assault on reproductive healthcare. Title X providers can no longer refer their patients for the full range of healthcare options and patients are no longer guaranteed to receive complete, accurate information about their healthcare," NARAL Pro-Choice America Vice President Adrienne Kimmell said in a statement provided to Refinery29.
Support for the domestic gag rule falls along partisan lines. Earlier this week, the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Appeals court allows Trump abortion rules to take effectA U.S. appeals court says new Trump administration rules imposing additional hurdles for women seeking abortions can take effect. Courts in Washington, Oregon and California had blocked the rules from taking effect Patriarchy lives. WarOnWomen You have to punish Iran, not women ... Women are the weakest thing on the ground, do not impose your strength on women
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Court Allows New Rules Blocking Family-Planning Funds for Abortion ProvidersA federal appeals court said the Trump administration can implement new rules prohibiting federal family-planning grants to health clinics offering on-site abortions or referrals for the procedure. PP needs to request an En Banc hearing and do it now. IPPF was more effective than the Nazis and the Soviets in their mission to kill Americans.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court allows war cross memorial to stand as symbol of 'sacrifice'JUST IN: Supreme Court rules cross in Bladensburg, Maryland, can stand, upholding constitutionality of a religious symbol on public land, but stopping short of creating a clear new standard for evaluating similar displays nationwide. Well I disagree. Inspires too much crazy. A cross has different meanings. Now a cross is universally used as a grave symbol.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standThe Supreme Court ruled that a cross at a World War I memorial is not a government endorsement of religion and can remain as it is. Pete Williams has details from the court steps. It's a fact of life many people believe in God AS long as Religion is Separate from State It's also a fact that in America laws are made based on religious beliefs Not a good thing Good. There are no church services held there. Everyone but Radicalized democrats know it was erected as a war memorial. It has stood in good standing for damn near a century and now has become part and parcel of where it stands. Maybe lets dig up Bob Byrd from ANC
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »