Supreme Court Shows It's Ready To Overrule Precedent, Dissent Sounds Alarm In California V. Hyatt

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S Supreme Court shows it’s ready to overrule precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt. Will Roe v. Wade be next?

Share to twitterU.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas arrives for the ceremonial swearing in of Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh in the East Room of the White House on October 8, 2018. The decision today in a residency tax audit case, on its third trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, shows how the Court is ready to overturn prior cases. Justice Stephen Breyer put it succinctly in his dissent: “Today’s decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next.

“This case shows that precedent gets little weight with the conservative justices on the Roberts’ Court; Justice Breyer expresses this well in his dissent,” says Erwin Chermerinsky, dean of University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, who argued the case on behalf of Hyatt in January.

The FTB case concerned Gilbert Hyatt, who moved from California to Nevada after earning big royalties on a technology patent. The California Franchise Tax Board pursued him, picking through his trash and contacting more than 100 third parties to try to prove that his move to Nevada was a sham to avoid $10 million-plus in state income taxes. Hyatt’s protest of that tax bill is still pending before the California Office of Tax Appeals.

Separately, Hyatt sued the FTB in Nevada state court for the torts he alleged the agency committed during the audit. California sought to have the case dismissed under its laws granting immunity to state officials. The U.S. Supreme Court

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

WATCH for strategically placed votes from conservative justices to TRY to show that the court has not been completely hijacked by partisan politics - see Kavenaugh’s dissent on Apple app case. All show to get to Roe.

Isn’t this what happened in the last Gilded Age?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Shows It's Ready To Overrule Precedent, Dissent Sounds Alarm In California V. HyattThe U.S. Supreme Court shows it’s ready to overrule precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt. Will Roe v. Wade be next?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

California wins in Supreme Court after 28-year fight with inventorThe Supreme Court ended a 28-year-old tax battle between California and a wealthy inventor who moved to Nevada by broadly shielding states from private lawsuits filed in other states. Er, so to evade a lawsuit I just have to move?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court clears way for iPhone users to sue Apple over App Store pricesA divided Supreme Court today cleared the way for iPhone owners to sue Apple for alleged 'higher-than-competitive prices' for apps sold in App Store
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Apple's surprise defeat in the Supreme Court is bad news for Tim Cook's turnaround planApple says services are its future. But a Supreme Court ruling Monday could ultimately harm the biggest part of its services business — its App Store. But good news for the rest of us
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court deals Apple major setback in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court is allowing iPhone users to move forward with their lawsuit against Apple. The suit argues Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store is an unfair use of monopoly power. China is one second away from booting Apple out of China. Time to short the mkt. You really think that exchange that you use is secured and safe. Aha sure :) Don’t think twice, keep your Assets secured, Get the Best Ledger Nano X at discounted price, Directly from Ledger. Unfair! It’s great, convenient and inexpensive. Show me a reason why I need multiple apps stores?
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Apple will face antitrust suit for its iPhone appsThe Supreme Court has cleared the way for Apple to be sued under antitrust laws for allegedly monopolizing the sale of apps on its iPhones. The 5-4 decision in the closely watched case could open the way for similar lawsuits against other online giants. Amazing, this packed Court can still get it right once in awhile.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court Says Consumers Can Sue Apple For Allegedly Monopolizing The App Store“Apple’s line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote. Here’s a novel idea...if you think something’s too expensive, just don’t but it!
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »

With abortion cases looming, Breyer warns Supreme Court may overturn major precedentNBC’s Pete Williams joins MTP Daily to discuss Supreme Court Justice Breyer appearing to issue a warning to his colleagues about Roe v. Wade, as several states move to enact abortion restricting legislation. Be careful what you wish for! I have a plan that would ELIMINATE abortions once and for all. Sterilize ALL boys at age 13! If desperate young women and girls must submit to forced medical procedures men must also! (We can reverse them if they get married.) Roe v. Wade is not being overturned. Even if it does, other states would make it legal. It was legal in some states before the decision. If precedent was wrong, it should be overturned. Abortion is a violence against the weakest. Parents who don't want to raise their child should give birth to an unborn child and entrust it to the care of government or social helper organization.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against Apple in dispute over app pricesThe Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling concluded that consumers who believe they've overpaid for apps can sue Apple and other app store operators on antitrust grounds Lawyers will LOVE this one. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 'consumers who believe they overpaid?' Wtf does that even mean? Don't like the price, don't buy it Hmmmm... K siding with liberals make me question this. Admittedly I know nothing to make a comment. But guess I had to display my shock.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »