Supreme Court Says Consumers Can Sue Apple For Allegedly Monopolizing The App Store

  • 📰 BuzzFeed
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

“Apple’s line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote.

The Supreme Court held that App Store consumers could sue Apple under antitrust laws, in a 5-4 decision Monday., written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, found that the four plaintiffs, who originally sued Apple in 2011 for unlawfully monopolizing the sale iPhone apps, could move forward with their case. Apple had contested the legal standing of the plaintiffs by claiming that they were not “direct purchasers” from Apple, but rather from the app makers themselves.

“Apple’s line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits,” Kavanaugh wrote. The court did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs’ case against Apple, only that they could legally proceed with the suit, which argues that the 30% commission Apple charges on every app sale is a consumer-borne cost imposed by a monopolistic company. That case could potentially open Apple up to a class action settlement or a loosening on its absolute grip on the sale of apps for its devices.Illinois Brick Co. v.

, which found that consumers couldn’t sue a party who had overcharged a third party that passed the cost on. The court Monday found that because Apple sells apps directly to consumers, the consumers can sue.Joe Bernstein is a senior technology reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in New York.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Here’s a novel idea...if you think something’s too expensive, just don’t but it!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 730. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court says Apple customers can sue over App Store pricesNEW: US Supreme Court rules that Apple customers can sue the company over the prices in the app store. Watch PeteWilliamsNBC break down the ruling. PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC Hahaha good luck now PeteWilliamsNBC So your telling me that a company set a price and you have the option to pay or not pay for it and this is a problem how? Don’t get an Apple iPhone. Get a Galaxy or whatever’s
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against Apple, allowing lawsuit targeting App Store to proceedThe 5-4 decision could spell serious repercussions for one of Apple’s most lucrative lines of business, and open the door for similar legal action targeting other tech giants in Silicon Valley. Is Apple screwed? WhiteSupremacist Attack on Muslim Family in Chicago StopKillingMuslims StopIslamophobia stophating WhiteSupremacistTerrorism first step in ending this never ending game of “monopoly”
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court clears way for iPhone users to sue Apple over App Store pricesA divided Supreme Court today cleared the way for iPhone owners to sue Apple for alleged 'higher-than-competitive prices' for apps sold in App Store
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against Apple in dispute over app pricesThe Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling concluded that consumers who believe they've overpaid for apps can sue Apple and other app store operators on antitrust grounds Lawyers will LOVE this one. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 'consumers who believe they overpaid?' Wtf does that even mean? Don't like the price, don't buy it Hmmmm... K siding with liberals make me question this. Admittedly I know nothing to make a comment. But guess I had to display my shock.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with their suit against the company. Now do Facebook Absolutely
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Allows Antitrust Suit Against Apple to ProceedThe Supreme Court ruled Monday that consumers can proceed with an antitrust lawsuit challenging Apple Inc.’s exclusive control over the marketplace for iPhone apps, threatening the tech giant’s slice of billions of dollars in software sales. Hell yeah. Ooh! I WANT A PIECE OF THAT! So won’t reign in Facebook, but will challenge the right of Apple to protect the security of users? Android is full of privacy & security issues BECAUSE they won’t control who can put apps into the system
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court just ruled against Apple in an antitrust case centered around the App StoreThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday gave the go-ahead for a lawsuit by consumers accusing Apple of monopolizing the market for iPhone apps. This is great news for the tech industry. SAI They are doing whatever they can to run the company. But then if everything is listed in the agreement for devs then this will not be a problem.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Apple will face antitrust suit for its iPhone appsThe Supreme Court has cleared the way for Apple to be sued under antitrust laws for allegedly monopolizing the sale of apps on its iPhones. The 5-4 decision in the closely watched case could open the way for similar lawsuits against other online giants. Amazing, this packed Court can still get it right once in awhile.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

IPhone owners can sue Apple for monopolizing App Store, Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court says consumers who accuse Apple of violating antitrust rules with its App Store can sue the company realDonaldTrump doesn't know sh*t. China has retaliated, raising the stakes in a trade war that has raised concerns about the future of global economic growth. The Asian nation announced increased tariffs on $60 billion. This only raises prices for US 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »