Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust case

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 16 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with their suit against the company.

The iPhone users argued that Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store was passed along to consumers, an unfair use of monopoly power. Apple argued that only app developers, and not users, should be able to bring such a lawsuit.

The iPhone users argued that Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store was passed along to consumers, an unfair use of monopoly power. "Apple's line-drawing does not make a lot of sense, other than as a way to gerrymander Apple out of this and similar lawsuits," Kavanaugh wrote.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Very conflicted on the Apple law suit. Consumers are the wrong plaintiff. Read more... AppleDevNews AppDeveloperMag AppleDevelopers AppleLawsuit

I think this is going to end up a consumer vs developer battle. Many people choose Apple products precisely because of the safety afforded by the “walled garden”.

VentWeekly

Well if the 30% of the users believe that, maybe is a good idea to proceed with after that!

Bad news. Sales of the iPhone are hurting so services will be key going forward.

Absolutely

Oh good Lord.

Now do Facebook

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Retired Supreme Court Justice: Trump 'exercising powers that do not really belong to him'Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens accused President Donald Trump of exceeding his presidential powers in an interview published Thursday, telling The Wall Street Journal that the President 'has to comply with subpoenas.' While many on the hill have complied with absolutely nothing ..... criminals running the show ! And he would know!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Venezuela's Supreme Court head rebuffs Pence's threats of sanctionsVenezuela's Supreme Court head, Maikel Moreno, on Wednesday rebuffed the U.... Let's see how that works out for you... venezuela will not be a vietnam only in Venezuela chavista a convicted kidnapper and murderer becomes the head of the supreme court, the venezuelan justice system in a nutshell...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Strict state anti-abortion laws aimed at Supreme Court, justices not eager to consider themRed-state governors and legislators are rushing to enact tough new anti-abortion laws in hopes that the Supreme Court is ready to rule favorably. That’s not a problem thanks to President Trump Sometimes medical advances cause precedents to become outdated and untenable. It is time for SCOTUS to review it's prior decision. ProLife This is how GARepublicans rammed this bill through a CORRUPT, GERRYMANDERED Republican Legislature. OUR FREEDOM DIES AND IT WAS MURDER by the GOP! Fight back against EVIL REPUBLICANS! ewarren BetoORourke PeteButtigieg GeorgiaDemocrat OccupyWallSt MoveOn YourAnonNews
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Protests erupt in India after top judge cleared of sexual harassmentDozens of protesters gathered outside India's Supreme Court on Tuesday, a d... India in the grip of immoral people in power. There are no protests in India... A fake allegation was taken down... A known lobby tried to tarnish the Chief Justice of India as he didn't bow to their whims and fancies... Reuters your source of funds seems to be the same as the lobby's... What an effort!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Perspective | ‘Executive privilege’ is a new concept built on a shaky legal foundationIt’s not mentioned in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court only recognized it in 1974. Executive privilege is an old concept built on a shaky legal foundation. Obama started it. Too late to be going over this premise. It's entrenched now, and both sides of the aisle like it that way. So the SCOTUS did recognize it. NEXT!
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Venezuelan court asks pro-gov't assembly to allow prosecution of opposition lawmakersVenezuela's Supreme Court said on Tuesday it had asked the country's C... The criminals after the righteous The bad gorilas chasing the good humans this is long over due. Get those terrorists supported by the US out of Venezuela
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Trump can make asylum seekers wait in Mexico, appeals court rulesA federal appeals court says the Trump administration can force asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for court hearings while the policy is challenged in court. Finally, some common sense in a crazy world. Thank heavens. The vast majority are NOT legitimate asylum seekers, & maybe now idiot adults including smugglers, traffickers, etc. will think twice bef dragging innocent children on a deadly & ILLEGAL journey they might not survive. Wonderful!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

In Mexico, new birth certificate must be issued after sex reassignment surgeryMexico's Supreme Court asked the state of Jalisco to grant a resident a new birth certificate that reflects their changed sex and name, another step toward equal rights in the socially conservative country. - NBCOUT NBCOUT Great move to mexico. We like reality here. NBCOUT This is crazy, dangerous &spreading like cancer! Aim is to create genderless society! America, we NEED to head this off from coming here! DON'T vote Dem! VoteIndependent They're targeting your children &they're already mixed up enough! Help slow down headwinds of destruction.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Immigrants may be deported for marijuana crimes in California, federal court rulesA court says the state legalization of marijuana doesn’t protect immigrants from deportation if they were convicted of pot crimes before the law was approved. Any excuse will do . *illegal immigrants Sounds good , they should be deported for chewing gum . American taxpayers have had enough ..
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »