The court heard that former Presidents are entitled to some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, significantly reducing the likelihood of a pre-election trial.
The ruling found that Mr Trump is entitled to “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for “official acts” taken as president, however, he is not immune for “unofficial acts”, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts. However, Trump could face charges for conduct undertaken in a personal or private manner, although any proceedings of that nature would likely be after the election in November.“Today’s ruling doesn’t change the facts, so let’s be very clear about what happened on January 6: Donald Trump snapped after he lost the 2020 election and encouraged a mob to overthrow the results of a free and fair election.
The Supreme Court’s decision was split along ideological lines, with the conservative justices leading the six to three split decision.writing in dissent, said the court’s decision in the Trump immunity case “makes a mockery of the principle … that no man is above the law.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US Supreme Court sends Trump immunity case back to lower courtThe move all but ends prospects the former US president could be tried before the country’s November election.
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »
Source: HuffPostUK - 🏆 108. / 51 Read more »
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »
Source: NECN - 🏆 20. / 71 Read more »
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »