Justice Michael Lee wanted to rule 'quick and dirty' on costs in Bruce Lehrmann's failed defamation case, but it's far from over"Quick and dirty" is how Justice Michael Lee said he wanted to rule on costs in the Bruce Lehrmann defamation case last week.But the truth is there has been nothing quick about it, and it is far from over — especially with an appeal looming.
In that interview, Ms Higgins alleged she'd been raped inside Parliament House in 2019 — and although she didn't name Mr Lehrmann, he said he was easily identifiable from the story and therefore had been defamed.Mr Lehrmann had taken on the network, and journalist Lisa Wilkinson, after his criminal trial over the alleged rape was abandoned, leaving no findings against him.
"For reasons which defy commonsense, Ms Smithies thought Ms Wilkinson faced a binary choice: to continue to endorse the credibility of the complainant in a pending sexual assault trial; or to act in a way that would be perceived as 'wavering' in supporting her credibility," Justice Lee said. Network Ten previously conceded it was obliged to pay some of the costs for Lisa Wilkinson to engage her own lawyers.It is already known Ms Wilkinson is seeking $1.8 million.
Lisa Wilkinson billed $8,000 per day in court during Bruce Lehrmann's failed defamation trial, documents revealSantos turns the tables on the climate movement as fossil fuel giant fights backBenjamin Netanyahu always finds a way to survive. His poll numbers just improved againThink you're smarter than a Hard Quiz contestant? I'll believe it when I see itBritain's beloved NHS was kneecapped by the Conservative Party.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »