Despite Supreme Court ruling, the future of emergency abortions is still unclear for US women

  • 📰 KPRC2
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 70 sec. here
  • 5 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 38%
  • Publisher: 68%

Joe Biden News

U.S. News,Health

The U.S. Supreme Court did not settle the debate over whether federal law requires hospitals to stabilize pregnant patients with emergency abortions on Wednesday, despite saying Idaho hospitals can provide abortions in medical emergencies even with the state’s restrictions.

Katie Mahoney, left, and Rev. Patrick Mahoney, chief strategy officer for Stanton Healthcare, an Idaho-based pregnancy center that does not provide abortions, read the text of a Supreme Court decision outside the Supreme Court on Thursday, June 27, 2024, in Washington.

Here is a look at emergency abortions in the U.S., the federal law that the Biden administration says requires hospitals to provide them, and why the debate on the legality of those abortions is far from resolved.Every year, about 50,000 women in the U.S. develop life-threatening complications during pregnancy, including sepsis, hemorrhaging or the loss of reproductive organs.

Idaho doctors say at least a half-dozen pregnant women have been airlifted to get emergency treatment in other states since January when the strict abortion ban, which allows doctors to perform abortion if a woman’s life but not her health is at risk, took effect.or “EMTALA,” requires emergency rooms to offer a medical exam if you turn up at their facility. The law applies to nearly all emergency rooms — any that accept Medicare funding.

over its strict abortion ban, which only allowed exceptions to save a woman’s life, arguing that the law prevented ER doctors from offering an abortion if a woman needed one in a medical emergency. Texas, for example, is suing the federal government over its guidance that says hospitals must provide abortions for women who need one in medical emergencies.against the administration in January, finding that EMTALA does not require Texas hospitals to provide abortions in emergency rooms. The Justice Department has appealed that decision.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 80. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Despite Supreme Court ruling, the future of emergency abortions is still unclear for US womenThe U.S. Supreme Court did not settle the debate over whether federal law requires hospitals to stabilize pregnant patients with emergency abortions on Wednesday, despite saying Idaho hospitals can provide abortions in medical emergencies even with the state’s restrictions.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Keeps Texas Inmate on Death Row Despite Objections From BenchJames Broadnax, who asked for a new trial based on racial discrimination grounds, will remain on death row for two murders.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Supreme Court gun precedent upheld despite Thomas dissentPolitical News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Abortions illegal in Mississippi despite Supreme Court ruling ensuring medication accessUse of the drug remains illegal in Mississippi and 13 other states that have near total bans on abortion.
Source: MSTODAYnews - 🏆 275. / 63 Read more »

Texas Supreme Court Rules Against Women Denied Abortions Despite Pregnancy ComplicationsThe court refused to provide clarity on exceptions to abortion bans in Texas.
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »

Alito tells lawmakers he will not recuse from Supreme Court cases despite flag controversySupreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told lawmakers in a letter Wednesday that he will not recuse from cases involving January 6, 2021, despite their concerns about two controversial flags that have flown on his properties.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »