Despite Supreme Court ruling, the future of emergency abortions is still unclear for US women

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 68 sec. here
  • 15 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 72%
  • Publisher: 51%

Abortion News

Idaho,Courts,Supreme Court Of The United States

The U.S. Supreme Court did not settle the debate over whether federal law requires hospitals to stabilize pregnant patients with emergency abortions on Wednesday, despite saying Idaho hospitals can provide abortions in medical emergencies even with the state’s restrictions.

Katie Mahoney, left, and Rev. Patrick Mahoney, chief strategy officer for Stanton Healthcare, an Idaho-based pregnancy center that does not provide abortions, read the text of a Supreme Court decision outside the Supreme Court on Thursday, June 27, 2024, in Washington.

“The decision the Supreme Court released this morning doesn’t shed any light on how that conflict will or should be resolved,” said Joanne Rosen, the co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Law and the Public’s Health. In rare cases with some of those complications, doctors might terminate the pregnancy, especially when there is no chance for a fetus to survive. For example, if a woman’s water breaks during the second trimester, a condition known as preterm premature rupture of membranes, the fetus may not be viable and continuing the pregnancy means that the patient may risk developing sepsis, an infection that can be deadly.

Those emergency rooms are required to stabilize patients if they do have a medical emergency before discharging or transferring them to another hospital. And if the ER doesn’t have the resources or staff to properly treat that patient, staff members are required to arrange a medical transfer to another hospital, after they’ve confirmed the facility can accept the patient.

Attorneys for Idaho argued there’s no conflict between the state and federal law since Idaho allows doctors to perform an abortion if the woman’s life is at risk. “The availability of abortions in emergency medical cases in Texas will continue to be extraordinarily limited,” Rosen of Johns Hopkins said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Keeps Texas Inmate on Death Row Despite Objections From BenchJames Broadnax, who asked for a new trial based on racial discrimination grounds, will remain on death row for two murders.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Supreme Court gun precedent upheld despite Thomas dissentPolitical News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Abortions illegal in Mississippi despite Supreme Court ruling ensuring medication accessUse of the drug remains illegal in Mississippi and 13 other states that have near total bans on abortion.
Source: MSTODAYnews - 🏆 275. / 63 Read more »

Texas Supreme Court Rules Against Women Denied Abortions Despite Pregnancy ComplicationsThe court refused to provide clarity on exceptions to abortion bans in Texas.
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »

Alito tells lawmakers he will not recuse from Supreme Court cases despite flag controversySupreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told lawmakers in a letter Wednesday that he will not recuse from cases involving January 6, 2021, despite their concerns about two controversial flags that have flown on his properties.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Alito refuses to recuse from Supreme Court cases despite Democrats’ demandsSamuel Alito will not recuse himself from Supreme Court cases involving Jan. 6 defendants and former President Donald Trump over a flag controversy
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »