Supreme Court should hear case against McKinney police

Vicki Baker shows paperwork related to her case in her McKinney home. A SWAT team pursuing a fugitive in July 2020 smashed her doors and shattered her windows. On June 28, Baker and the Institute of Justice will file a petition with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to hear her case, writes Jeffrey Redfern. Baker seeks compensation from the McKinney police., and the city refused to compensate her, former McKinney resident Vicki Baker is taking her fight to the U.S. Supreme Court.

It’s crucial the court hears Baker’s case and makes it clear the government must compensate innocent people when it destroys their property.while she was not home. The fugitive barricaded himself inside the home, leading to a standoff with McKinney police, who raided the home. The estimated damage was $60,000, and the person who was under contract to buy Baker’s home understandably backed out of the deal.

For years, the city has been relying on a theory that government actions taken under “police power” are somehow different from other government actions, and thus do not require victims to be paid. Under this theory, the government would need to compensate someone if it took their land to build a highway, but not if it flattened their home while pursuing a fugitive. This argument is absurd, because the cost of a public good should be borne by the public, not one unlucky individual.

Jeffrey Redfern is a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice who has represented Vicki Baker since her home was damaged by the McKinney Police Department. We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Oklahoma Supreme Court court rejects proposed religious public charter schoolThe state Supreme Court said the first-of-its-kind school, approved last year by the charter school board, violated the state and U.S. constitution.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

The one court that even the Supreme Court sees as going too farSteve Benen is a producer for 'The Rachel Maddow Show,' the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of 'The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics.'
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Trump campaign reacts to bump stock Supreme Court decision: ‘The court has spoken’Former President Donald Trump's campaign supported the Supreme Court's decision to strike down a Trump administration ban on 'bump stocks,' which enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rounds faster.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court ordersThe justices tightened the standards for when a federal court should issue an order to protect the jobs of workers during a union organizing campaign.
Source: komonews - 🏆 272. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court sends dispute over Arkansas' GOP-drawn congressional map back to lower courtLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court ruling may allow officials to coordinate with social platforms againKarissa is a senior reporter at Engadget, covering Meta, Twitter, TikTok, Snap and all things social media. Her interests include tech policy, internet culture, and all the ways our online activities shape our IRL selves.
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »