The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with a former Indiana mayor convicted of accepting a bribe from a business shortly after it was awarded municipal contracts, a ruling that one dissenting justice called “absurd” and critics said weakens public corruption laws.of former Portage, Indiana Mayor James Snyder, a Republican who took $13,000 from a trucking company after helping it obtain more than $1 million in city contracts.
However, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor that “officials who use their public positions for private gain threaten the integrity of our most important institutions.”🚨BREAKING: The Supreme Court just issued a ruling allowing donors to give cash to public officials in exchange for favors.June 26, 2024
“Snyder’s absurd and atextual reading of the statute is one only today’s court could love,” she asserted. “Ignoring the plain text of §666 — which, again, expressly targets officials who ‘corruptly’ solicit, accept, or agree to accept payments ‘intending to be influenced or rewarded’ — the court concludes that the statute does not criminalize gratuities at all.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Source: AFPFactCheck - 🏆 540. / 51 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »