Critics fundamentally misconstrue the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

  • 📰 ladailynews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 31 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Whatever the merits of a bump stock ban, in other words, regulators cannot unilaterally impose one, especially when that decision suddenly criminalizes the conduct of gun owners who abided by the l…

After the Supreme Court overturned the Trump administration’s bump stock ban last week, critics complained that the justices had interpreted the Second Amendment in a way that rules out perfectly reasonable gun regulations. That was an odd complaint, because the case did not involve the Second Amendment.

Although Murphy is a lawyer and Vance is a law professor, they completely misconstrued what this case was about. The Supreme Court ruled that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority when it tried to ban bump stocks. Under federal law, a machine gun is a weapon that “automatically” fires more than one round “by a single function of the trigger.” A bump-fired rifle plainly does not fit that definition: It shoots just one round each time the trigger is activated and, given the manual effort necessary to fire additional rounds, does not fire “automatically.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 332. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court allows disputed South Carolina voting map that critics say excludes Black votersState lawmakers who approved the map said the changes were driven by political party, not race.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

Alito Says 'Reasonable' People Aren't Mad He's on Supreme Court Trump CaseAlito said his critics are trying to change the decision of the Supreme Court.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »