Supreme Court won't stop Biden leaning on social media giants to tackle disinfo

  • 📰 TheRegister
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 73 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 61%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

White House can get back to asking Facebook and co kindly to bin off what the Feds say is misinformation

The US Supreme Court has reversed a prior decision barring federal agencies from coordinating with social media platforms to fight misinformation, on the grounds the plaintiffs in the case lacked standing to argue it to begin with. issued on Wednesday, the federal government is free to return to reaching out to social media platforms to get what the Feds say is significant false information flagged or removed.

The suit later evolved to include alleged unlawful suppression of online posts related to controversially unsubstantiated claims of mail-in ballot fraud and conspiracies surrounding President Biden's son, who was incidentally this monthThe social media policing case was initially decided last year in the plaintiffs' favor, in a Louisiana federal court, before being appealed by the Feds to the Fifth Circuit, whichthe lower court ruling last September.

"To obtain forward-looking relief, the plaintiffs must establish a substantial risk of future injury that is traceable to the government defendants and likely to be redressed by an injunction against them," the SCOTUS majority decision reads. The Biden administration signaled it's ready to begin making use of its restored rights to coordinate with social media platforms to fight what it sees is misinformation, saying the SCOTUS decision was"the right one."

"The government can press third parties to silence you, but the Supreme Court will not find you have standing to complain about it absent them referring to you by name apparently," said NCLA senior litigation counsel John Vecchione."This is a bad day for the First Amendment." "Educating the public is an important function of government, but government suppression of dissenting viewpoints is unconstitutional and un-American," Chilson said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 67. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Rules for Biden Administration in Social Media Dispute With Conservative StatesThe Supreme Court sided with the Biden Administration in a row with Republican-led states over controversial social media posts.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

The Supreme Court rules for Biden administration in a...The Supreme Court sided with Biden after GOP-led states claimed Democrats in federal government were unconstitutionally censoring conservative social media posts.
Source: DailyMailUK - 🏆 7. / 90 Read more »

The Supreme Court rules for Biden administration in a...The Supreme Court sided with Biden after GOP-led states claimed Democrats in federal government were unconstitutionally censoring conservative social media posts.
Source: DailyMailUK - 🏆 7. / 90 Read more »

Alito Rejects Calls to Step Aside from Supreme Court Cases Because of Flag ControversiesJustice Samuel Alito is rejecting calls to step aside from Supreme Court cases because of controversial flags that flew over his homes.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

Breaking Down the Supreme Court’s Ethics Rules as Justices Come Under FireThe justices rely on self-policing to uphold ethical standards, but the effectiveness of these internal mechanisms has been called into question.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

Roberts rejects plea to discuss Supreme Court ethics and Alito flag controversyJustices decide for themselves when to step aside from cases.
Source: Observer_Owl - 🏆 18. / 72 Read more »