READ:The Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration can keep censoring social media posts on topics like COVID-19 and election security.
The GOP states had argued that White House communications staffers, the surgeon general, the FBI and the U.S. cybersecurity agency are among those who applied 'unrelenting pressure' to coerce changes in online content on social media platforms. Former Missouri Attorney General - and now-Senator Eric Schmitt - reacted to the case saying it 'wasn't the outcome we were hoping for,' but it is a 'huge win' because it 'exposed nearly every part of the Biden Administration’s vast ‘censorship enterprise.’'
The Supreme Court had earlier acted to keep the lower-court rulings on hold. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have allowed the restrictions on government contacts with the platforms to go into effect. The appellate panel said officials cannot attempt to 'coerce or significantly encourage' changes in online content.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Rules for Biden Administration in Social Media Dispute With Conservative StatesThe Supreme Court sided with the Biden Administration in a row with Republican-led states over controversial social media posts.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Israeli Supreme Court Controversially Rules Ultra-Orthodox Men Must Serve in MilitaryThe decision could lead to the collapse of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition, which relies on ultra-Orthodox parties, as Israel continues to wage war in Gaza.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Fossil fuel emissions should be considered in planning for new drilling sites, Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court ruled emissions created by burning oil should have been considered when granting planning permission for a new oil well in Surrey.
Source: itvlondon - 🏆 116. / 51 Read more »
Breaking Down the Supreme Court’s Ethics Rules as Justices Come Under FireThe justices rely on self-policing to uphold ethical standards, but the effectiveness of these internal mechanisms has been called into question.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v Wade has had wider ramifications than previously reportedWomen residing in states with the most restrictive abortion policies after the Supreme Court's reversal of 'Roe v Wade' also experienced declines in the use of birth control pills and emergency contraceptives, according to a new USC study evaluating the impact of the decision.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »
A Mistake in the Early 1970s Still Haunts Supreme Court EthicsAfter a scandal forced Justice Abe Fortas to resign, judicial ethics reforms had a fatal flaw.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »