US Supreme Court upholds gun ban in domestic abuse cases

  • 📰 FT
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 21 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Decision acknowledges limits to Second Amendment rights when there is a ‘credible threat’ of harm to others

The US Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on the possession of firearms by people under domestic violence restraining orders, in a case that has been closely watched as the country’s high court grapples with the balance between gun rights and public safety. The court’s 8-1 majority on Friday found in US vs Rahimi that barring individuals who threaten others’ safety from keeping firearms does not violate the US constitution’s Second Amendment, which protects the right to bear arms.

He later violated the agreement — under which his gun license was suspended for two years — and threatened another woman with a gun. Rahimi was finally indicted for possessing a firearm while subject to a domestic violence restraining order. He sought to dismiss the indictment by arguing the underlying law conflicted with the right to bear arms under the second amendment. The motion was denied.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 113. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Alito Rejects Calls to Step Aside from Supreme Court Cases Because of Flag ControversiesJustice Samuel Alito is rejecting calls to step aside from Supreme Court cases because of controversial flags that flew over his homes.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

Q&A: What's at stake with the U.S. Supreme Court case on misinformation?Concerns over medical misinformation are not new, but the COVID-19 pandemic magnified long-simmering tensions over two fundamental concepts: Freedom of speech and the federal government's responsibility to protect people from what it considers false and dangerous claims.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »

Breaking Down the Supreme Court’s Ethics Rules as Justices Come Under FireThe justices rely on self-policing to uphold ethical standards, but the effectiveness of these internal mechanisms has been called into question.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

Roberts rejects plea to discuss Supreme Court ethics and Alito flag controversyJustices decide for themselves when to step aside from cases.
Source: Observer_Owl - 🏆 18. / 72 Read more »

Roberts rejects plea to discuss Supreme Court ethics and Alito flag controversyJustices decide for themselves when to step aside from cases.
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »