Chief Justice John Roberts has declined an invitation to meet with Democratic senators to talk about Supreme Court ethics and the controversy over flags that flew outside homes owned by Justice Samuel Alito.
Mr Alito said he concluded nothing about the flags, both of which he said were flown by his wife outside their homes in Virginia and New Jersey, required his recusal. “Moreover, the format proposed — a meeting with leaders only of one party who have expressed an interest in matters currently pending before the court — simply underscores that participating in such a meeting would be inadvisable,” he wrote.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Roberts rejects plea to discuss Supreme Court ethics and Alito flag controversyJustices decide for themselves when to step aside from cases.
Source: Observer_Owl - 🏆 18. / 72 Read more »
Alito Rejects Calls to Step Aside from Supreme Court Cases Because of Flag ControversiesJustice Samuel Alito is rejecting calls to step aside from Supreme Court cases because of controversial flags that flew over his homes.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Breaking Down the Supreme Court’s Ethics Rules as Justices Come Under FireThe justices rely on self-policing to uphold ethical standards, but the effectiveness of these internal mechanisms has been called into question.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Q&A: What's at stake with the U.S. Supreme Court case on misinformation?Concerns over medical misinformation are not new, but the COVID-19 pandemic magnified long-simmering tensions over two fundamental concepts: Freedom of speech and the federal government's responsibility to protect people from what it considers false and dangerous claims.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Rejects Conservative Attack on the Consumer Financial Protection BureauThe justices ruled 7-2 that the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded does not violate the Constitution.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court Sides With Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Spurning a Conservative AttackThe Supreme Court rejected a conservative-led attack In a major victory for consumer rights.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »