FILE – Attorney Margaret R. Prinzing, representing the California Governor and Legislature, standing, speaks at the California Supreme Court in San Francisco, Wednesday, May 8, 2024. The California Supreme Court on Thursday, June 20, removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature. from the Nov. 5 ballot. Even though 1.
Actually, if necessary the Legislature could pass a tax hike, then call a snap special election to get voter approval. Just three years ago, on July 1 Secretary of State Shirley Weberthe signatures in the attempted recall of Gov. Gavin Newsom, voters started receiving ballots in the mail on Aug. 16 and the election was held on Sept. 14. Total: 76 days.
Moreover, the usual tradition of the Supreme Court is to let initiatives ride until after the voters make their decision. If an initiative loses, then no problem: the voters rejected it. If it passes, then the court can check it out. The PPIC“It makes no sense to anyone,” Jon Coupal told us of the decision. He’s the president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and co-chair of the TPA. “Any semblance of impartiality in the California judiciary is now gone.
The court decision now means it’s open-season on taxpayers. Coupal advised to keep fighting for better legislators and a new governor in 2026 after Newsom, who cannot run again due to term limits, leaves office.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »