California Supreme Court weighs two cases that could limit the ballot initiative process

  • 📰 CalMatters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 70 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Two California Supreme Court cases raise the issue of whether there are restrictions on the use of the ballot initiative process.

Attorney Jeffrey L. Fisher speaks at the California Supreme Court in San Francisco on May 21, 2024. Photo by Martin Novitski, Supreme Court of Californiaa commentary forum aiming to broaden our understanding of the state and spotlight Californians directly impacted by policy or its absence. Learn moreSeven years ago, California’s Supreme Court declared broad support for the historic right of voters to make law through the initiative process.

Ever since the 2017 Upland ruling, California has seen a flurry of tax increases placed on the ballot via initiative, many sponsored by public employee unions. Needing only simple majority approval, the vast majority passed. In 2020 the Supreme Courtthat would impose or restore state constitution restrictions on taxation. Among other things, it would overturn the Upland decision by requiring local taxes to garner two-thirds voter approval, even if proposed via initiative.

The Supreme Court has until June 27 to declare whether the Business Roundtable measure will appear on the ballot, or is a constitutional revision that cannot be proposed by initiative., the 2020 ballot measure, sponsored by Uber, Lyft and other companies, to exempt themselves from Assembly Bill 5, a highly contentious 2019 state law aimed at strictly limiting or prohibiting the use of contract workers.

Justice Liu once again mused over the limits, if any, on use of the initiative process, saying there is “still ambiguity there.” “Does that mean voters cannot act in this field whatsoever,” Liu asked lawyers for both sides.Decisions on the two pending cases will reveal whether the court continues to endorse fairly unfettered use of the process, as it did in the Upland case, or tighten restrictions on how its employed.Gig companies spent more than $200 million to write their own labor law.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 261. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The U.S. Supreme Court just gave California a major opportunity to lower housing costsA U.S. Supreme Court ruling on housing impact fees has given California lawmakers an opening to address a key barrier to construction: cost.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court could reset homelessness policy in CaliforniaThe justices parse the rights and humanity of homeless people in a potentially far-reaching case, plus more from Opinion.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Should California's Supreme Court overturn new rooftop solar rules?The state's high court has agreed to hear arguments from environmental groups that oppose the changes the California Public Utilities Commission made to the net energy metering program
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Opinion: U.S. Supreme Court handed California a chance to lower housing costsRuling gives state lawmakers an opening to look at how housing impact fees are imposed and how they can be challenged.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court will hear case claiming California company’s CBD product got trucker firedThe Supreme Court will hear an appeal from a hemp oil company fighting a lawsuit from a truck driver who says he got fired after using a product falsely advertised as being free from the active ing…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Why one California retiree’s Supreme Court win is a victory for property rights nationwideCalifornia retiree George Sheetz has spent more than seven years locked in a long-running legal dispute with his local county over exorbitant permitting fees.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »