A DA kept Black women off a jury; California Supreme Court says that wasn't racial bias

  • 📰 KTVU
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 7 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 42%
  • Publisher: 53%

Us News

Ca,Alameda County,News

Twenty-four years later, the Alameda District Attorney’s office is in the hot seat for allegedly striking Black and Jewish people from juries around the time of Nadey’s sentencing. A federal judge two months ago ordered it to review all of its death penalty cases to look for signs of racial bias.

One by one, a California prosecutor eliminated five out of six Black women from the jury pool for a death penalty case in which a white carpet cleaner slayed his client, a young mother.The attorney in Alameda County had a reason for each dismissal. He believed one, for instance, appeared too reluctant to impose a death sentence. Another had a "liberal bent.

The burden is largely on the defendant to prove racial bias in criminal hearings, but in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that threshold, ruling that prosecutors have to provide reasonable, race-neutral explanations when challenged in court. California has since enacted greater protections for those contesting their sentences, including a 2022 law that allows those convicted before 2021 to petition the court if there is evidence of racial bias in their case.

In a dissent, two justices wrote that the court should have paid more attention to Nadey’s argument that Black women were improperly removed from the jury pool. They pointed to the federal order mandating reviews of Alameda County’s death penalty cases."Today’s decision is particularly jarring given what has come to light in federal court regarding capital jury selection in Alameda County around the time that Nadey was tried," the dissent by Justice Goodwin Liu reads.

This story was originally published by CalMatters and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 465. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California Supreme Court weighs two cases that could limit the ballot initiative processTwo California Supreme Court cases raise the issue of whether there are restrictions on the use of the ballot initiative process.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

Walters: California Supreme Court weighs two cases that could limit the ballot initiative processBusiness interests are increasingly using initiatives to counter what they regard as too much regulation, taxes and fees.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

California Supreme Court appears hesitant to overrule voters on gig worker lawCalifornia Supreme Court justices appear poised to uphold Prop. 22. Their decision could have a huge effect on the gig economy.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

Can California Supreme Court strike the right balance on bail?The state Supreme Court will soon weigh fairness to defendants versus public safety in the California bail system.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

Oil industry asks Supreme Court to block climate change lawsuits from California, other statesThe Supreme Court is being asked to block climate change lawsuits filed against oil companies by California and other blue states.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Oil industry asks Supreme Court to block climate change lawsuits from California, other statesOil and gas companies are asking the Supreme Court to block dozens of high-powered lawsuits seeking to hold the industry liable for billions of dollars in costs related to climate change.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »