Supreme Court upholds California woman's drug smuggling conviction that leaned on expert's opinion

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 16 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a California woman's drug smuggling conviction that was based in part on an expert's testimony that criminal gangs rarely use 'blind mules' to move drugs across the southern border.

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a California woman's drug smuggling conviction that was based in part on an expert's testimony that criminal gangs rarely use 'blind mules' to move drugs across the southern border. In a 6-3 decision, the justices rejected Delilah Diaz's contention that the expert testimony was unfair and illegal because it strongly suggested to jurors that she must have known drugs were hidden in her car.

The methamphetamine weighed just over 54 pounds and had an estimated retail value of $368,550. Diaz said the car was her boyfriend's and she knew nothing about the drugs. She was charged with drug trafficking, and prosecutors were required to prove to the jury that she knew she was transporting drugs.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court could weaken environmental law used in California housing conflictsA recent state Supreme Court ruling could curtail misuse of the California Environmental Quality Act by those who oppose development.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules California man can't trademark 'Trump too small'The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase Trump too small.
Source: 13WHAM - 🏆 256. / 63 Read more »

What The Supreme Court Ruling On The Abortion Pill Means For Access In CaliforniaIn its first ruling on reproductive rights since overturning Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a lawsuit that questioned the FDA’s approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules California man can’t trademark ‘Trump too small’The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase 'Trump too small.'
Source: FOXLA - 🏆 445. / 53 Read more »

What the Supreme Court ruling on the abortion pill means for access in CaliforniaThe U.S. Supreme Court upheld access to the abortion pill, affirming the FDA's approval of mifepristone. California Democrats commended the decision.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules California man can't trademark 'Trump too small'The Supreme Court has ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.”.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »