What the Supreme Court ruling on the abortion pill means for access in California

  • 📰 CalMatters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld access to the abortion pill, affirming the FDA's approval of mifepristone. California Democrats commended the decision.

Get the news that matters to all Californians. Start every week informed.California has expanded access to abortion since the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe vs. Wade. The court today upheld access to the abortion pill, rejecting a case that questioned the FDA's approval of mifepristone. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMattersIn its first ruling on reproductive rights since overturning Roe v. Wade, the U.S.

Kavanaugh wrote, “plaintiffs have not shown — and cannot show — that FDA’s actions will cause them to suffer any conscience injury.” Advocates for abortion and reproductive rights were quick to celebrate the decision across social media. They say the ruling helps preserve access for people who live in rural and low-income areas.“This #SCOTUS decision is a victory for #ReproductiveRights and #WomensRights!” Democratic Sen. Toni Atkins of San Diego said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

A container with boxes of Mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortions, at the Alamo Women’s Clinic in Carbondale, Illinois on April 20, 2023. Photo by Evelyn Hockstein, Reutersand found that medication abortions obtained via telehealth appointments are just as safe as in-person medical care, with 98% of patients completing the abortion without the need of additional medical care.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 261. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules California man can't trademark 'Trump too small'The Supreme Court has ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.”.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules California man can't trademark 'Trump too small'The Supreme Court has ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.” The justices on Thursday upheld the government’s decision to deny a trademark to Steve Elster, a California man seeking exclusive use of the phrase on T-shirts and potentially other merchandise.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects California man's attempt to trademark Trump T-shirtsIn case involving a California man, Supreme Court rejects trademarks that rely on a person's name, including former President Trump.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court rules California man can't trademark 'Trump too small'The Supreme Court has ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.”.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court asks Justice Department to weigh in on climate change suits in California, other statesThe Supreme Court puts off a decision on whether to intervene in the fight between blue states and oil industry.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

People's Park: California Supreme Court allows new student housingA California Supreme Court ruling will allow student housing at University of California to be built at Berkeley’s historic People’s Park - a win for UC Berkeley, which has been trying to build more housing for years.
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »