Under the planning law, it had been assumed that only the impact of emissions from extracting the oil should be considered in planning applications for new extraction projects, not the subsequent burning of fossil fuels too.The court ruling means that the future of new oil and gas in the UK has been thrown into doubt.While the ruling does not prohibit new drilling it is something that companies will have to consider when looking at future projects.
In a ruling backed by Lord Kitchin and Lady Rose, he said: "The reasons accepted by the council for excluding the combustion emissions from consideration and assessing only direct greenhouse gas emissions from within the well site boundary are therefore demonstrably flawed"He continued: "In my view, there was no basis on which the council could reasonably decide that it was unnecessary to assess the combustion emissions.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Landmark supreme court ruling could threaten future UK oil drillingSupreme Court has ruled Surrey Council should have considered climate change impacts of new oil wells.
Source: BBCScienceNews - 🏆 87. / 53 Read more »
UK fossil fuels at risk after landmark Supreme Court rulingA campaigner had challenged Surrey County Council’s decision to allow the expansion of an oil well site
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »
Supreme Court Hands Activist a Loss for ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark AttemptThe Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the U.S. Trademark Office's rejection of the trademark application was not unconstitutional.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Supreme court rejects case that would have curbed access to abortion drugThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a case that aimed to curb access to the controversial abortion drug mifepristone, saying the plaintiffs who brought the case to the court had no legal standing to do so.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »
US Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill mifepristoneThe Supreme Court is also is expected to rule by the end of June on the legality of Idaho's strict Republican-backed abortion ban that forbids terminating a pregnancy even if necessary to protect the health of a pregnant woman facing a medical emergency.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down Challenge to Abortion Drug MifepristoneThe Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously rejected a challenge to curtail access to the commonly-used abortion pill mifepristone.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »