FILE - In this Jan. 24, 2019, file photo, the Supreme Court is seen at sunset in Washington. Vast changes in America and technology have dramatically altered how the census is conducted. But the accuracy of the once-a-decade population count is at the heart of the Supreme Court case over the Trump administration’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The justices hear arguments in the case Tuesday, April 23.
The citizenship question has not been asked on the census form sent to every American household since 1950, and the administrations desire to add it is now rife with political implications and partisan division. No population count is perfect, and census designers strive to create a questionnaire that is clear and easy to answer.
It seems likely that the census taker himself was responsible for the confusion in Robert Kagans citizenship status. Dozens of families who lived near the Kagans have similar crossed-out entries in the citizenship column.
The SupremeCourt in Plyler v. Doe (1982) ruled that citizenship questions ( requesting birth cert. over passports etc) have a 'chilling effect'. They ruled that you do not have to be a citizen to get a free public education or EqualProtection. Chilling effect again? 2020Census
The SupremeCourt in Plyer v. Doe (1982) ruled that citizenship questions ( requesting birth cert. over passports etc) have a 'chilling effect'. They ruled that you do not have to be a citizen to get a free public education. Chilling effect again? 2020Census
AveriHarper Accuracy... congressional representation is based off citizenship
We should not set our legislative body,size and scope, by counting people who are not legal citizens. Democrats, once again, want to steal elections.
Read the responses, now what does the Constitution say.
So what's your opinion about Vladimirovich Putin? He is a missed prominent figure amidst all these circuses.
My wife is proud to be an immigrant who followed all the rules and will soon be a citizen. She finished her civics test last month and will take the oath in May. If she was still in immigrant she would be happy to answer the census question.
Everyone makes perfectly good and accurate sense pertaining to the citizenship question on the 2020 census. Unfortunately none of that matters to liberals, illegals must vote with no questions asked .
States receive federal funding and Congressional representative seats based on population. That census question is to ensure illegals are not included in the measurement and to ensure fairness/equal treatment among states.
What is it people don’t get about Congressional Districts and Electoral votes being determined by the population of an area determined by the Census?
…Democrats want to water down your state’s representatives and voice by allowing multitudes of illegals to be counted in the census without noting if they are citizens. This is the most brain dead move by Democrats.
A census is a waste. Voter registration should be the basis for the census. If you don't vote, you don't get counted.
The census determines State funding, State representation, electoral college votes. Yes, it's important to know how many non-citizens are living within each State.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Allergan bid to use tribe to shield drug patentsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cast aside pharmaceutical company Allergan Plc&... Wow these companies will do anything for money smh
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects death row appeal over anti-gay jurorSupreme Court again rejects gay death row inmate's appeal that claims jurors in South Dakota were biased against him because of his sexual orientation. sad, 2, say' but it's probably,.....true! No buddy, they were biased against you because you killed someone Omg everyone wants to blame everyone else but themselves..greats wat to get a retrial claim your gay ...I swear
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court declines to take up First Amendment case brought by rap artistThe Supreme Court declined Monday to take up the case of rapper Jamal Knox, who argued he was sent to prison for a song that was protected by the First Amendment. 🤷🏻♀️ Although this may be true, you can’t convey illegal things to your followers, that should be illegal. But if all there evidence was based on the song you should have not been jailed
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
F-word: Supreme Court struggles with law blocking trademark protection in cases of vulgarityThe Supreme Court expressed disdain for the public display of vulgarity Monday, but seemed reluctant to use federal trademark law against it. Today DONALD J. TRUMP Announced...that we'll be offering 401(k)s to all of our employees tomorrow. We are doing what the tax cuts were meant to do as a small business to compete against big business: invest in our people, invest in growth.' — Small Business Owner Carlos Gazitua Good.. If this jerk had any sense of decency, he wouldn't use this language in the first place! Shame on him and the moral corruption he espouses. cnn maddow MSNBC ap USSupremeCourt bbb_us HouseDemocrats SenateDems ABC 60Minutes CBSNews ChurchNewsroom USCCB NRFnews
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Opinion | Tensions on the Supreme Court are spilling into viewOpinion: Tensions on the Supreme Court are spilling into view pack the court Completely inevitable.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects death row appeal over anti-gay jurorThe US Supreme Court is again rejecting a gay death row inmate's appeal that claims jurors in South Dakota were biased against him because of his sexual orientation. Good. This is wrong ,the F jurors were baisad, & that is why they questioned the judge about men's jail & gay marriage. This supreme courts is too conservative which almost make them baisad on some of their rullings. This is not America. Yes, that's why.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court debates whether FUCT clothing line can trademark its nameThe Supreme Court heard a lively argument Monday on whether the 1st Amendment’s protection for the freedom of speech extends to words and symbols that the government’s trademark office views as “scandalous.”
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Chevron says Dutch Supreme Court rejects Ecuador's $9.5 billion claimThe Supreme Court of the Netherlands dismissed Ecuador's attempts to annul ... Chevron says, 'We're an oil company - we shit where we want'. Legal entities look at their pension investment portfolios and agree!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
India's Supreme Court considers call to open mosques to womenIndia's Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to consider a petition from a Musli... On that report about a 5 year old 'falling' off a 3rd floor in a mall... you forgot to say that the BLACK man PUSHED that 5 year OLD WHITE boy. I'm mexican and i don't like the preference you are giving a group just to not upset far leftist. I'm an Obama Democrat- a centrist. India’s SC same rule on Hindu temples have fallen on deaf ears. It took a right-wing Hindu government to fix all the political correctness bullshit from 3 decades of Liberal governance. It's time to stop pleasing the minority and apply the same standards to them as the majority of the country.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
The Supreme Court scrutinises a bar on “scandalous” trademarksA clothing brand with a tasteless name gets its day in court alllibertynews I have a DIG BICK
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Should we expand the Supreme Court?Commentators say a knockdown battle over every open Supreme Court seat is demoralizing for the country and cements the perception of the court as a political body. There have been a number of Supreme Court reform proposals discussed over the years. Merrick Garland was a true American hero and his memory will live on. The precedent was set. Presidents don’t pick a Supreme Court Justice with less than a year in office. The Dems knew they would lose so that is why they are so bitter. Have a better lead in next time & maybe you won’t get a Trump. Dem Joe Biden rule was used as precedent to not confirm Garland - if you are a Dem, and a Dem makes the rule that is abided by - doesn’t get any fairer than that!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »