A contest over two little girls, the women who raised them and the elder child's biological father has framed the terms for a High Court showdown over what it means to be a parent.
Mr Masson and Susan Parsons had been friends for 20 years when they conceived a baby "privately and informally" in December 2006, at a time Ms Parsons was beginning her relationship with her current partner, Margaret Parsons, the Family Court found. The case has implications for hundreds of single women whose children were conceived with known donors and responds to a phenomenon that has outpaced legislation.
But Family Court judges have relied on Commonwealth laws that do not define the rights of a sperm donor if the mother does not have a partner at the time of conception. Nowhere is the term "parent" defined. Justice Margaret Cleary applied the Commonwealth law and found in October 2017 that Mr Masson was the father of the girl, taking into account his intentions at the time of her conception, his involvement in her life and his genetic contribution.
Not an expert but humans are part of the climate change. Keep it in your pants unless you want to be part of the child’s life. Then there no confusion.
Biological father has a right to be present in his child's life, has parental rights as a biological father. HighCourtofAus Child has a right to know own biological father & ancestors. Fundamental human right to know own biological family & relatives, to know who you are.
The male person whose gamete is used to create a new human being is a biological father of that human being, of course, there's no doubt. HighCourtofAus The two people, man & woman, whose gametes form a child are biological parents of that child.
Ridiculous
Insanity is now the mainstream.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Anti-abortion activists lose High Court challenge to scrap buffer zonesTwo anti-abortion activists have lost a High Court appeal after arguing safe access zones outside clinics breached their free speech. In short illustrating what they actually want is the right to obstruct and harass people, since they can stand outside the exclusion zone and yell their hateful shit all they like but nah that's not good enough for them... Free speech does not include nor legitimize screaming abuse at and harassing others. Bloody religious terrorists
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »
High Court to decide if a sperm donor can be a parentA contest over two little girls, the women who raised them and the elder child's biological father has framed the terms for a showdown over what it means to be a parent | HatAlexander HatAlexander Children denied their right to a father, but I bet the 'sperm donor' (let's not give him humanity) can be forced to pay 'child support'. Fix it cporterwa ! HatAlexander Why not, there have been many cases where a man has died and his partner has petitioned to the courts & been granted approval to use his stored sperm, even against the wishes of his family.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
High Court rules against pro-life activists | Sky News AustraliaThe High Court has ruled that safe access zones outside abortion clinics do not breach freedom of speech. \n\nThe case was brought by two anti-abortion activists who were convicted for protesting too close to abortion clinics in Melbourne and Hobart. \n\nPro-life protesters have argued Tasmanian and Victorian state legislation infringes their right to political communication, but the states defended the 150-metre safe zone as 'crucial' to protecting the privacy and safety of patients and staff. \n\n\n\n\n Who is ruling for Safe Zones for the Unborn?
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
High Court finds abortion clinic 'safe access zones' constitutionally validThe High Court has rejected a claim by anti-abortion advocates that they have a right to protest outside abortion clinics | LisaVisentin LisaVisentin Uteurs belongs to U not MY. LisaVisentin . What if they say its a veganprotest instead? LisaVisentin . What if they just throw eggs at abortionists, instead?
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Anti-abortion activists lose legal challenge to laws preventing protests outside clinicsTwo anti-abortion activists lose their High Court bid over protest laws. Best news in a long while. Good Can we get laws to prevent vegans protesting inside/outside farms abattoirs or any food venue selling meat.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »