Olympic medal hopeful Peter Bol has once more had his integrity dramatically challenged by the world anti-doping body amid the airing of previously secret evidence uncovered on the runner’s phone, sparking furious accusations the anti-doping body had “disgracefully smeared” the Australian champion.
But in a surprise development in the Court of Arbitration for Sport case heard last week, scientists from WADA challenged the assertion that Bol had recorded a “false positive” in his first failed drug test and said his case had only been dropped due to the time that elapsed between tests which caused degradation of the urine samples.
The letter discussed micro-dosing EPO and how to avoid drug testers. CAS heard it was photographed by Bol five weeks before he was drug-tested and returned an initial positive drug test. WADA argued it was Greene who had introduced the issue of Bol’s seized computer and phone being found to be “clean” and they were only responding to an inaccurate assertion.
Conte was the founder and CEO of BALCO, Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, based in California who served four months in jail after pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute steroids. Another WADA scientist, Dr Sven Voss, added: “It was not only time, it was the freeze and thaw cycle in between which could have affected the concentration.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »