The Supreme Court Just Greenlighted Racial Gerrymandering. It Didn’t Go Far Enough for Clarence Thomas.

  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 6 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 51%

Opinionpalooza News

Supreme-Court,Clarence-Thomas,Gerrymandering

In a startling concurrence, the justice faulted Brown v. Board of Education for empowering the court to limit racist redistricting.

is a devastating blow to the fight against racial gerrymandering. Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the conservative supermajority guts a series of precedents that guarded against racist redistricting, granting state legislatures sweeping new authority to sort their residents between districts on the basis of skin color.

And yet, as bad as Alito’s opinion was, it didn’t go far enough for Justice Clarence Thomas, who penned a solo concurrence demanding a radical move: The Supreme Court, he argued, should overrule every precedent that limits gerrymandering—including the landmark cases establishing “one person, one vote”—because it has no constitutional power to redraw maps in the first place.

Thomas wrote that SCOTUS can fix its mistake by returning “political districting to the political branches, where it belongs.” But how can victims of racist redistricting prevail in the political branches when those very branches have permanently locked them out of power by making their votes count for nothing? They can’t, which is why the Supreme Court stepped in.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 716. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

NY court upholds mandatory abortion coverage; Albany diocese plans Supreme Court appealALBANY, N.Y. (AP) New York can continue to require companies with health insurance plans to cover medically necessary abortions, the state's highest court rule
Source: 13WHAM - 🏆 256. / 63 Read more »

How the Supreme Court’s Originalist Rampage Got Its StartOriginalism is no older than bell bottoms but it’s much deadlier.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

The Latest: Arguments start at Supreme Court in Trump's bid to avoid prosecutionArguments are underway at the Supreme Court in Donald Trump's bid to avoid prosecution over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court Does South Carolina GOP a Solid, Overturns Racial Gerrymander RulingThe Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling that determined South Carolina unlawfully removed 30,000 Black voters from the state’s 1st District.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Greenlights South Carolina's Gerrymandered Maps, Undermining Black Voters' VoicesNewswire Editor is a Common Dreams staff position.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Opinion: What Alito’s flag controversies say about the Supreme CourtIf Chief Justice John Roberts is genuinely concerned about the integrity of the Supreme Court and public perceptions about it, then he has a big problem on his hands, writes Julian Zelizer.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »