New livestreaming legislation fails to take into account how the internet actually works

Both are aimed not at terrorists but at technology companies. And how that’s done is where some of the new measures fall down.The laws focus on abhorrent violent material, capturing the terrorist incident in New Zealand, but also online content created by a person carrying out a murder, attempted murder, torture, rape or violent kidnapping.

The criminal element of fault is not that the service provider deliberately makes the material available, but rather that they are reckless with regards to identifying such content or providing access to it. Reckless, however, has been given a rather special meaning.Source:FacebookFocusing on regulating technology services is the right approach. Back in 2010 when I first raised this idea it was considered radical; today even Mark Zuckerberg supports government regulation.

Also to be welcomed is the new ability for the eSafety Commissioner to issue a notice to a company identifying an item of abhorrent violent material and to demand its removal. When the government is aware of such content, there must be a way to require rapid action. The law does this.

While the presumption can be rebutted, this is still quite different from what the Attorney-General’s press release claimed: Hosting services have the worse of it. They provide the space on servers that allows content to appear on the internet. It’s a little like the arrangement between a landlord and a tenant. With hosting plans starting from around $50 a year, there’s no margin to cover monitoring and complaints management.

'... once they become aware their service is being used to access abhorrent violent material that occurred or is occurring ...' So I should inform the roads dept. that people are using the roads to access something bad at their friends place? Fkn idiot politicians. auspol

Typical knee-jerk reaction by Australian government, placing a poorly-defined and blanket policy in place without much thought or due diligence.

Orwellian

For fuck sake this will have a avalanche effect on alot of things we all enjoy. Does this mean the UFC will be banned because its “violent content” or maybe Game of thrones?

We are ruled by the dumbest lot of politicians and administrators ever. Wouldn't know a ROM from a RAM and that the internet was designed to stop the likes of you and other dictators from interfering with free speech. You can't stop it, wankers. Political posturing by Morrison.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Accused New Zealand mosque shooter returns to courtToday may be the day that the Christchurch shooting victims’ families come face-to-face with the Australian man arrested over a terror attack on two mosques. My god, can you please please please stop using this man's photograph in your articles and as the primary headline image on your site. Please show some decency. Why are you showing this mass murdering arsehole's face? As a matter of common decency STOP PUBLISHING HIS PHOTO!
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »

Accused Christchurch mosque shooter to be represented by two New Zealand lawyersTwo New Zealand barristers will represent an Australian man facing 50 murder charges and 39 attempted murder charges in New Zealand’s High Court today. 9News will he get community service ? Tell me again why the death penalty was abolished? poor lawyers
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »

NZ to bring in gun amnesty and buyback scheme | Sky News AustraliaTough new gun laws in New Zealand and are set to take effect within days after Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern's push and rapid response to the Christchurch terror attack.\n\nPolice minister Stuart Nash said the bill, if passed as expected, will take effect on 12 April, less than a month after the 15 March attacks which killed 50 people.\n\nParallel to Australia's response to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, the legislation includes a gun amnesty and a buyback scheme which will be available until September 30.\n\nThe bill bans military-style semi-automatic weapons, assault rifles, and several modifications which can convert guns to having military-grade firing capacity.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n jacindaardern A true leader a marvellous PM 😢 Australia 🇦🇺 needs one URGENTLY .JohnWren1950 jacindaardern Tough new gun laws are great, except for one thing, the important 'bit', There is nothing in the legislation about banning bullets or the supply of equipment for the making of. Not rocket science. jacindaardern Good luck with that ..........the CRIMS still have the guns
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »