The justices on Thursday took up for the first time whether a former president has absolute immunity from criminal charges for actions he took while in office, as Trump claims. He is the first former president to be charged with crimes.
Special counsel Jack Smith's team is asking for a speedy resolution. The court typically issues its last opinions by the end of June, about four months before the election.for their official acts. Otherwise, they say, politically motivated prosecutions of former occupants of the Oval Office would become routine and presidents couldn't function as the commander in chief if they had to worry about criminal charges.
Nearly four years ago, all nine justices rejected Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from a district attorney’s subpoena for his financial records. That case played out during Trump’s presidency and involved a criminal investigation, but no charges. The lack of apparent support on the court for the sort of blanket immunity Trump seeks has caused commentators to speculate about why the court has taken up the case in the first place.
But Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said the court never should have taken the case because an ideologically diverse panel of the federal appeals court in Washington adequately addressed the issues.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: PhillyDailyNews - 🏆 89. / 67 Read more »
Source: WGAL - 🏆 331. / 59 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »