OTTAWA — Making an accused person wait in jail before trial should be the exception, not the rule, the Supreme Court of Canada says in a decision that affirms a key legal safeguard intended to ensure speedy justice.In clarifying how the provisions should work, the court said Parliament wanted to make certain that people awaiting trial have their cases reviewed by a judge at set points in time to consider whether keeping them in jail is justified.
“Delays in routine bail and detention matters are a manifestation of the culture of complacency denounced by this Court in Jordan, and must be addressed,” Chief Justice Richard Wagner wrote on behalf of the court in Thursday’s decision.In the pre-trial context, release -- at the earliest opportunity and in the least onerous manner -- is the default presumption in Canadian criminal law
At issue was section 525 of the Criminal Code, which outlines procedures for detention review hearings aimed at preventing accused people from languishing in jail before trial.
That's what they make the big bucks for, decisions like this? Wow
The Supreme Court has lost its marbles when it says that people should not be jailed and await trial but free to run around and commit other crimes to pay for their lawyers—nothing better to provide an income to lawmakers !!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court stresses jail should be ‘the exception’ for people awaiting trialParliament intended to ensure that people awaiting trial have their cases reviewed by a judge at set points in time to consider whether keeping them in jail is justified, the court says
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Myanmar Supreme Court hears appeal of jailed journalistsLawyers for two Reuters journalists sentenced to seven years in prison for their reporting on Myanmar's brutal crackdown on Rohingya Muslims have appealed their conviction to the country's Supreme Court.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Wilson-Raybould says leaks of Supreme Court pick dispute should be investigatedJody Wilson-Raybould has added her voice to the federal Conservatives' call for judicial investigation into leaked reports about years-old tension between herself and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over her choice of a Supreme Court justice. obfuscation ... and the power play continues ...
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould Clashed Over Her Supreme Court Pick: SourcesThe former attorney general denies there was 'conflict' over the issue.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »
Relations between Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould began to fray over her Supreme Court pick: SourcesRelations between Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then-Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould first began to fray in 2017 over concerns about her choice to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court of Canada. You might want to read the Judges statement before you use yourCon talking points! Please don’t be SO obvious! Trudeau has lost all confidence from his own party. The country despises him. He’s over his head! He has a name only. He’s a girly boy Drama teacher, trust fund baby that reads a script whenever he’s on camera! He’s an embarrassment! TrudeaMustgo That doesn’t change the fact that Trudeau and his Cronies committed Obstruction of Justice a month ago does it? No,so why is the media pushing a narrative to say they were having a “personal” issue when there was no issue at all?Let the PM and his Cronies do the smearing please..
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Supreme Court leaks become a gusher - Macleans.caPolitics Insider for March 27: Supreme Court leak backlash, the ethics committee takes a pass, and canola wars heat up JWR is really out to damage the Trudeau brand.. She should resign from caucus already cdnpoli Don't t forget the 2014 leak , 6 candidates, Harper You mean the media's faux backlash.
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »