Supreme Court stresses jail should be ‘the exception’ for people awaiting trial

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 92%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Parliament intended to ensure that people awaiting trial have their cases reviewed by a judge at set points in time to consider whether keeping them in jail is justified, the court says

The Supreme Court of Canada says making an accused person wait in jail before trial should be the exception, not the rule, in a decision that affirms a key legal safeguard intended to ensure speedy justice.

In a 9-0 ruling today, the high court says people accused of crimes are automatically entitled to periodic reviews of their detention under provisions set out in the Criminal Code. In clarifying how the provisions should work, the court says Parliament intended to ensure that people awaiting trial have their cases reviewed by a judge at set points in time to consider whether keeping them in jail is justified.It means jailers must apply to a judge for a hearing on behalf of the accused at the 30-day mark in cases involving lesser offences, and at the 90-day mark in cases involving indictable offences.

The case landed at the high court as a result of an appeal by Corey Lee James Myers, who was arrested on several firearms charges in British Columbia three years ago. Though Myers eventually pleaded guilty to reduced charges, he also challenged a decision to keep him in custody pending trial.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court leaks become a gusher - Macleans.caPolitics Insider for March 27: Supreme Court leak backlash, the ethics committee takes a pass, and canola wars heat up JWR is really out to damage the Trudeau brand.. She should resign from caucus already cdnpoli Don't t forget the 2014 leak , 6 candidates, Harper You mean the media's faux backlash.
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court safeguards investor-protection lawsThe top court refused to further narrow the scope of who can be held liable for securities fraud
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Wilson-Raybould says leaks of Supreme Court pick dispute should be investigatedJody Wilson-Raybould has added her voice to the federal Conservatives' call for judicial investigation into leaked reports about years-old tension between herself and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over her choice of a Supreme Court justice. obfuscation ... and the power play continues ...
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Wilson-Raybould calls for investigation into confidentiality breaches in the Supreme Court appointment processSeparately, Conservative justice critic Lisa Raitt is pointing a finger at “sources close to the prime minister” for the breaches, and calling on the federal agency that oversees the appointment process to investigate Trudeau would be wise to just shut the hell up at this point, hes in a battle of wits unarmed. OMG, is this pissing match ever going to end?
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Wilson-Raybould calls for investigation into leak of confidential Supreme Court appointment process‘I strongly condemn anyone who would speak about or provide information on such sensitive matters,’ Jody Wilson-Raybould said MBPrairieGirl6 Go get them Jodi! The ovesized ego of this egocentric person is sickening. Leak it then call for an investigation. I’m not falling for it, Jody. cdnpoli
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

Relations between Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould began to fray over her Supreme Court pick: SourcesRelations between Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then-Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould first began to fray in 2017 over concerns about her choice to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court of Canada. You might want to read the Judges statement before you use yourCon talking points! Please don’t be SO obvious! Trudeau has lost all confidence from his own party. The country despises him. He’s over his head! He has a name only. He’s a girly boy Drama teacher, trust fund baby that reads a script whenever he’s on camera! He’s an embarrassment! TrudeaMustgo That doesn’t change the fact that Trudeau and his Cronies committed Obstruction of Justice a month ago does it? No,so why is the media pushing a narrative to say they were having a “personal” issue when there was no issue at all?Let the PM and his Cronies do the smearing please..
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould Clashed Over Her Supreme Court Pick: SourcesThe former attorney general denies there was 'conflict' over the issue.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »