Ketanji Brown Jackson's Comments Raise MAGA's Eyebrows

  • 📰 Newsweek
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 52%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court heard arguments over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social media posts.

Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's comments on Monday regarding the 1st Amendment amid the Murthy v. Missouri case has Donald Trump's Make America Great Again supporters raise concerns.On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case brought by two Republican attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri, as well as five social media users, who accused the Biden administration of going too far in putting pressure on social media platforms to take down misinformation.

Some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson told Benjamin Aguiñaga, the Louisiana solicitor general.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 468. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘concerned’ First Amendment is ‘hamstringing’ government from censorshipThe Democratic Supreme Court justice was harshly criticized by conservatives for her argument.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Michael Jackson Estate, Katherine Jackson Clash in Court Over $600 Million Catalog DealLawyers for Katherine Jackson said the estate should be held 'in contempt' for finalizing deal, but a judge said the executors were free to move ahead
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »