Supreme Court on Monday marches back into the battle over social media content moderation in a challenge on free speech grounds to how President Joe Biden's administration encouraged platforms to remove posts that federal officials deemed misinformation, including about elections and COVID-19.
The case tests whether the administration crossed the line from mere communication and persuasion to strong arming or coercing platforms - sometimes called"jawboning" - to unlawfully censor disfavored speech, as lower courts found. The Republican backers of those laws have voiced concern over what they portray as bias against conservative voices on these platforms. Many researchers, as well as liberals and Democrats, have warned of the dangers of social media platforms amplifying misinformation and disinformation about public health, vaccines and election fraud.
The Justice Department said that government officials, including presidents, long have used the bully pulpit to express views and to inform on matters of public concern.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: STForeignDesk - 🏆 4. / 71 Read more »
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »
Supreme Court decision on Trump is a “grave error”Latest Breaking News
Source: IndependentSG - 🏆 9. / 63 Read more »