House Judiciary Committee chairman says US Department of Justice letter describing Robert Mueller's report on Russia probe"does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him".
In a four-page letter to Congress, Attorney General William Barr quoted Mueller's report as stating it "does not exonerate" the president on obstruction. Instead, Barr said, it "sets out evidence on both sides of the question." The House Judiciary Committee chairman said Congress needs to hear from Barr about his decision and see "all the underlying evidence."
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Mueller Report Finds No Russia Conspiracy, But Obstruction Of Justice Is A Murkier QuestionMueller's report found no Russia conspiracy, but obstruction of justice is a murkier question No. it's not. Mueller hit the bench, SDNY you're up
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Mueller report finds no evidence that Trump campaign colluded with Russia: Justice DepartmentUPDATE: Trump has no plans to request an investigation of the 'other side' by the attorney general at this time: White House spokesman Riiiiiiiight? ...Reuters Apology Forthcoming.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Mueller states no exoneration for Trump on obstruction, Trump claims oppositeAccording to MSNBC Chief Legal Analyst Ari Melber, Attorney General Barr’s letter tries to go much farther than what Special Counsel Mueller found on obstruction. The Attorney General, who Donald Trump appointed, tries to declare that the president did not obstruct justice, despite the fact that Mueller did not try to resolve that fact. AriMelber Russian collusion AriMelber and sinema, jones and manchin voted yes to confirm. AriMelber You’re hacks
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Mueller finds no Trump-Russia conspiracyThe special counsel’s nearly two-year-long probe concluded without finding adequate evidence to show that officials with Trump’s 2016 campaign aided Russian attempts to interfere with the election Ofcourse. Now time to fight back. It's almost impossible to prove a 'quid pro quo' which is what was required here to prove a conspiracy. Great news! We should be happy our president didn’t conspire with a foreign country
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »