Focusing on the personhood and rights of a fertilized egg over those of pregnant people limits the ability of all people to build their families as they see fit.
As an OB-GYN and abortion provider who cares for patients at all stages of the reproductive life span, I am deeply concerned about the local and national implications of the recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling and its impact on access to fertility care. The court’s opinion that frozen embryos should be considered “extrauterine children” demonstrates why so-called “fetal personhood” arguments are catastrophic not only for abortion access, but for IVF as well.
It is therefore essential, now more than ever, that politicians and judges are dedicated to preserving access to full spectrum reproductive healthcare for all.Alabamians are now discovering that the premise of “fetal personhood” is harmful in more ways than one; just as it can be invoked to restrict the right to abortion, so too can it be interpreted in ways that cut off access to fertility care.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: mynbc15 - 🏆 262. / 63 Read more »
Source: NPRHealth - 🏆 144. / 63 Read more »
Source: CBSHealth - 🏆 480. / 51 Read more »